>>14350255>to do listso nothing existed as of yet?
>>14350644you need to re explain all those "complicated physics" since a single IK chain dont explain much for an entire cycle.
>study maths firsti am, but it seems no matter how detail i go into you can only parrot the words "robotics" and "IK" which is flattering except they also show you dont know jackshit. hell you cant even make trajectory or why cant a trajectory work
>simpleryes because you are too stoopid to explain how robotics fit into this so i asked you to go for the simplest 140 letters to avoid you crying your balls out.
>businesswell apparently the market is littered with this assortment of garbage it s natural to ask for whatever cheapest, and you keep saying it's too complex so i chew it soft for you to simpler ideas you can write in 140 words like a single linear algebra but you kept complaining it s too hard, so i guess not from you either because you can only parrot the word "robot" and "ik" which is also not "iq". good day and dont cry
>>14350646maybe, i didnt got physics since we had to choose major in science or social and i wasnt good enough for science.
>sarcomereok thats like the z axial forces but doesnt explain the whole pattern of a walk motion. more details please?