>>14348643I already told you, the entire reason I cited it is because it backs up my claims and directly contradicts yours that most of the land used for grazing livestock is not suitable for crop growth and can only support grass and shrubs that only ruminant animals can digest.
>That's not field rotationThen go prove the government wrong, it is not my definition it is straight out of the usda's technical glossary, but it is what rotation grazing is, you are wrong, rotation grazing has nothing to do will making hay and selling it for a profit instead of grazing animals on the land.
> The farms that happen to be in deserts do not have an issue growing their own cropsThe farms in deserts for the most part, don't farm crops, they farm livestock with hay they get from other states.
>You are the only one calling google a source. No I said google wasn't a source after you used it as your only source other than "books". I used a different search engine and the book and government information I found proves you wrong, so you just ignore it and keep pretending every book agrees with you even though you can not cite a single one.
It talks about what cows eat and where their feed comes from (which proves you wrong) and then goes on to explain how to do it better.
I am the only one introducing actual sources, you are strawmanning, cherry picking, ass-pulling, and trying to justify why you don't need to cite any sources.
If you don't present an actual source and only use name calling to make your point, I am not even going to bother replying any more because you are clearly some sort of vegan shill trying to sell impossible burgers or whatever bullshit you people come up with next to destroy the human diet and the environment.