>>14347006Yeah, they call it "predictive policing". It ranges from relatively benign, low tech methods regarding pscyhology and sociology and criminology, to high tech statistical and computational methods, all the way up to futuristic next-generation, DARPA-funded research projects in biotech and neuroscience.
See
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predictive_policingDespite what all the pro-censorship shitlibs in this thread are saying, this isn't some wacko idea or a "far-right conspiracy theory". I think ethical concerns about this sort of technology don't get enough attention, and social media sites will censor the fuck out of you if you try to discuss any of this stuff, but there actually is a sizable amount of academic literature on the matter, so you can just ignore all the woke shitlibs because they literally don't know what they're talking about. Actually, they're so uninformed about these topics that most of them don't even realize that these fields and subjects exist, but if you bring them to their attention, they'll feel no qualms about sperging out at you. It's their NPC programming kicking in. As I said, however, you can just ignore them, because there are plenty of reliable academic sources discussing these issues. Pdf related is one example.
The real scary shit is all the neural interface technology and other biotech stuff they're developing, like the Orwellian field of "moral bioenhancement" that I mentioned here
>>14346829If you thought the unconstitutional NSA PRISM surveillance program that was exposed by Edward Snowden is an issue, just wait until the NSA and CIA get their hands on "neural interface" tech or "moral bioenhancement" technology. Does anyone really think that the "constitution" or "human rights" will discourage these agencies from abusing this sort of technology? Of course not, as soon as they get their hands on it, they're going to misuse this stuff, just like they immediately used the internet for illegal, warrantless spying.
