>>14337922I think using the wording AI is a little misleading, lets call it neural networks instead, less room for anthropomorphisation.
Neural networks all work pretty much the same way. instead of writing the code/article/motion/solution yourself, you just give it a bunch of good examples i.e in this case give it a bunch of examples of how articles are usually written. the function of the neural network is then to write and "average article" based on a few parameters, these will be solution-specific.
They "sound werid" because they are not written by a single person, they are written by the thousands of authors who have trained the neural network thereby creating an "average author" of sorts. this average author is gonna be shit at pretty much everything because they never specialised in a specific writing style, phrasing or structure buildup.
neural network reporting is good in cases of baseball results or things like that, but in cases where you need a bit more insight, an "average author" is just gonna come out all wrong.
writing about the ukraine war would be near impossible as this is a very very new situation therefore the avalible amount of training data is very limited, and also lacking in variation. The ukraine war is a very complicated issue, which has not been covered nowhere near enough.
For now AI's are pretty much only writing sports articles and other predictable, and boring stuff.
