>>14331481Your schizophrenic definitions involve completing infinite processes, a task no human can do. I know analysis, and it's pretty much all schizo completed infinity bullshit. Facts:
- There are no canonical forms of real numbers. This means there is no system for representing every real number that can be implemented on a computer, unlike the rationals.
- Even if you come up with a system to represent a small computable part of real numbers, you still won't be able to have canonical forms for real numbers, compare two real numbers, add them, multiply them.
- This means the "reals" are not a real number system like integers, rationals, Gaussian integers, complex rationals, rational quaternions etc. It's schizophrenic bullshit completely disconnected from reality.
- Even the claim that one real number is equal to another is an empirically meaningless assertion, as in the Kleene hierarchy it's Pi_2.
You're welcome for the lesson.
