>>14357795>it is notyes, it absolutely is
>source of every belief can be called as suchno, belief is not based in understanding, only in experience
belief is the enemy of knowledge
>asked you about the specificsno, both times when I gave you the general answer, you asked about the generality
when you asked for specifics, I provided specifics
>is it your term?it's a term used in plant biology that has been used for almost 200 years
you really don't have much knowledge about these things, do you?
>is it how you got convicted?it's amusing how you are still trying to project your own "midwit" and "guru"-like thinking onto me
again, everything I'm saying comes from understanding and experience, a confluence of thorough understanding in the fields of plant biology, human physiology, biochemistry, and evolutionary biology
>You did not.yes, I absolutely did
>reports on those experiments so I can read them in detailfirst of all, there are literally thousands of such studies, you can easily find them for yourself
secondly, like I said, such experiments are practically worthless, because the act of experimentation interferes with natural processes
nothing can replace understanding and experience as a source of knowledge
>So some people eat all that.virtually zero people subsist exclusively on foods that are fresh off plants in areas with sufficient Solar energy, where these compounds exist in their natural and highly energized and potent state, with synergistic effects that cannot be gained in any other way
instead most people only incorporate such foods as part of their diet while continuing to ingest toxic garbage that interferes with bodily processes and cause aging, as well as consuming such foods when they've been detached from the plant for a long time, or even worse, when detached long before even reaching maturity, in which case they are toxic rather than beneficial
>suppements it's impossible to imitate any of this with supplements, as I already made clear
