>>14333467Exactly, but also in our small group of course, even if we weren't close friends, there is a MAD policy in effect since everyone knows everyone's real name.
>>14333499Congrats on PNAS. Actually it's only a 5.5 journal for me now because of the shitty new editor, I see that Scientific Reports is also only 3.4 now I had thought this was my best (yes, we got rejected from Nature). We have a manuscript in rebuttal stage for a 13.3 journal though, so this will be my best soon, but not good enough to shill here imo.
>>14333629Even posting my stuff on LinkedIn or ResearchGate is a violation of my contract that says I am not allowed to post on my work externally without eplicit permission from the directorate.
Almost everyone knows I post on /sci/, but mixing your professional stuff with posting on reddit or 4chan just looks bad and it's a slippery slope before we end up like the fucktards shitposting their professional dirty laundry on twitter.
