/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #14325268

342KiB, 1078x949, laser.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Tue 22 Mar 11:28:08 2022 No.14325268 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>14325271 >>14325654 >>14325834 >>14326008

>oh that clearly observable thing that contradicts my literally made-up theory?
>yeah its wrong because it doesnt fit my model. see, look at this unprovable garbage i pulled out of my ass to account for it
science is about coming up with SCIENTIFIC hypotheses not untestable mental masturbation and creative writing exercises

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1647948681728.png, 191KiB, 414x319

Anonymous Tue 22 Mar 2022 11:31:46 No.14325271 Report

Quoted By:

>>14325268

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Mar 2022 14:21:27 No.14325654 Report

Quoted By:

>>14325268
Things can be affected by more than one thing at a time.
>gravity said that a ball thrown at a an angle would make a parabola, but that didn't!
>well that was because of air resistance.
>WHY YOU MAKING THINGS UP!
your basic flatearther.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Mar 2022 15:31:55 No.14325834 Report

Quoted By: >>14325844

>>14325268
wasnt it hawking who joined some tv program that used a laser to "prove" the earth was round? (meanwhile this was already done by many flatearthers for a longer distance proving it flat).

I suppose hawking just isnt very knowledgable about the latest soience. Someone tell him.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Mar 2022 15:34:46 No.14325844 Report

Quoted By: >>14325869

>>14325834
Kinda hard to tell him that these days. And you ignore the refraction mentioned in that diagram.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Mar 2022 15:46:04 No.14325869 Report

Quoted By: >>14325912

>>14325844
my point is you are claiming hawking doesnt know his physics...

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Mar 2022 16:12:18 No.14325912 Report

Quoted By:

>>14325869
I'm not op. I though you were op. Hard to tell sarcasm from real opinions with these dudes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Mar 2022 16:51:49 No.14326008 Report

Quoted By:

>>14325268
unprovable garbage?
you mean beam divergence and atmospheric refraction?
both of those exist independently of the worlds shape

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches