>>14319674I believe I've tracked down the report mentioned in the Guardian article:
https://famguardian.org/Subjects/Environment/Articles/ClimateChange-20090131.pdfA couple issues I have with this report:
- It isn't a scientific paper.
- It isn't written by climate scientists, although they were interviewed by the authors.
- It isn't a realistic prediction of what's going to happen. Authors admit at the beginning that the report exaggerates predicted phenomena:
> The scientists support thisproject, but caution that the scenario depicted is extreme in two fundamental ways. First,
they suggest the occurrences we outline would most likely happen in a few regions, rather
than on globally. Second, they say the magnitude of the event may be considerably smaller.
It is a "what if" report that isn't meant to be a scientific prediction - which explains why it isn't in line with actual scientific predictions.
Could you provide *scientific* evidence?
