>>14318409I came back to check up on this thread and re-looking at this picture, it makes me extraordinarily angry. If anything men would be the ones that are phased out not women, but in either case it makes no sense to do such a thing.
What is this disgusting treatment of humans? It makes no sense from any perspective. You're perpetually torturing a person in order to produce a child that doesn't even have a parent to raise it, you can imagine some retarded scenario where classrooms of babies are somehow coddled by caretakers into being a state slave but then you'd just end up with a bunch of psychologically fucked children. You may as well just have had the mom and dad raise the kids anyway instead of chopping off her arms for no reason, losing a human and a productive member of society and a parent to the next generation of humans. The whole thing makes no sense.
You can't replace the family unit and hope to have undamaged psychologies in the children. The children will always be fucked if they are not raised properly by humans, they will not be balanced, and it will collapse your society in a single generation. Any scenario that somehow thinks you can properly raise something as complex as a healthy human being in a mass-produced way without parents is doomed to failure.
The big women and small men don't do this. Theyre normal people, just highly intelligent and athletic and women are big and men are small. They grow up in big intelligent families raised by their mother and father, with many siblings, and a large society that functions in the same way.
I am not looking at women as a purely birthing unit which you seem to be thinking that I am, I'm simply not denying the two sexes' roles in reproduction. If you hate me because you think that I think that women are good for nothing but their womb, then you don't understand the first fucking thing and you haven't been reading anything that I've written about my ideas at all all this time.
