>>14315565>hawking radiationThis seems sort of blurry to me, is it only applicable to black holes?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation"An important difference between the black hole radiation as computed by Hawking and thermal radiation emitted from a black body is that the latter is statistical in nature, and only its average satisfies what is known as Planck's law of black-body radiation, while the former fits the data better. Thus, thermal radiation contains information about the body that emitted it, while Hawking radiation seems to contain no such information, and depends only on the mass, angular momentum, and charge of the black hole (the no-hair theorem). This leads to the black hole information paradox. "
>i think he confused black body ration with hawking radiation.Can you explain what you mean by your statement for a layman fag like myself?
