>>14305398yes, definitely possible to go near 100% green in 50 years or so
>>14305414agree
>>14305426most likely it will be a combo of renewable and nuclear, perhaps some biomass and gas (considering it is about the least pollutant of all fossil fuels)
>>14305547hydropower in places where it is possible is definitely reliable, so is tidal (in places where it is possible). Wind and solar are a bit unreliable, but it is mitigated by various storage technologies. Also storage is not that big of an issue really, just use potential energy from gravity, molten salt like spain does, etc
>>14305615true