Basically it goes like this:
If the research results can be used to implicate the jews in any type of crime, most commonly against the population, then it is very likely true and based.
If on the other hand the research results can be used to exonerate the jews from a hypothesized wrongdoing, then it should be taken with six million grains of kosher salt.

So far I’ve used this method to screen research regarding microplastics and seed oils, and I’m liking my results.
What methods does /sci/ use to determine the legitimacy of your references since we all know the peer reviewing process has long since been fake and gay?