>>14292847Arno breker is a retarded faggot who made melodramatic sculptures
The beauty you talk about is intrinsic to our species and, by association, evolutionary upbringing. Intelligent life that arise from totally different circumstances, with a body unlike ours, would likely lack the same inherent satisfaction, arousal, and overall appreciation of the human anatomy that we would have. This means our evolution-driven concepts of beauty can, and likely would, contradict others. Given that there are fossils of asymmetrical organisms in the pre-cambrian era, it’s entirely possible that there exists sexually reproducing intelligent beings that are asymmetrical. This means that they would develop a sense of beauty unlike ours. In order to facilitate cooperation, they would find their own species’ anatomy pleasing or unalarming, and they would develop pattern recognition to detect each other, much like how humans have evolved to detect faces. They would also have an inherent attraction towards the opposite sex if their method of reproduction was personal and not like egg spawning, since close interaction would be required. This would all lead to their standards of beauty being vastly different from ours, and it would be just as “real” as ours.
>Tldr you’re a schizo faggot