The European Commission recognises gas and nuclear as green energy
No.14279193 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>14279220 >>14279223 >>14279538 >>14279639
The European Commission recognises gas and nuclear as green energy, despite the opinion of its own experts against it.
>The European Commission has approved on Wednesday the final Delegated Act on the Taxonomy of Sustainable Activities, which classifies gas and nuclear as sustainable energies for the ecological transition. The decision comes a week after the EU's expert advisory group issued a report rejecting the change to the regulation.
>The green taxonomy regulation aims to steer private investments towards economic practices that are more environmentally friendly and help accelerate the ecological and energy transition. With this change, gas and nuclear are put on the same level as renewable technologies such as solar and wind. This means that these two energy sources will receive the privileges of non-greenhouse gas emitting technologies.
https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2022/02/01/why-is-the-eu-s-green-investment-label-for-nuclear-and-gas-so-controversial
What's /sci/'s opinion? I, for one, agree with the nasty EU. (anti-nuclear shills not welcome)
>The European Commission has approved on Wednesday the final Delegated Act on the Taxonomy of Sustainable Activities, which classifies gas and nuclear as sustainable energies for the ecological transition. The decision comes a week after the EU's expert advisory group issued a report rejecting the change to the regulation.
>The green taxonomy regulation aims to steer private investments towards economic practices that are more environmentally friendly and help accelerate the ecological and energy transition. With this change, gas and nuclear are put on the same level as renewable technologies such as solar and wind. This means that these two energy sources will receive the privileges of non-greenhouse gas emitting technologies.
https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2022/02/01/why-is-the-eu-s-green-investment-label-for-nuclear-and-gas-so-controversial
What's /sci/'s opinion? I, for one, agree with the nasty EU. (anti-nuclear shills not welcome)