>>14277937Unknown content of the article aside, I agree with him in the sense that “critical thinking”, as promoted by pundits on the left and right, isn’t really critical thinking but just plain contrarianism. And “rabbit holes” (on the 2022 World Wide Web that’s just basically referring to the YouTube algorithm) will simply be a string of suggested content pieces that usually support each other in a daisy chain. Less critical thinking and more “if you’ve swallowed up everything so far, the next load will also be palatable”. Actual critical thinking involves honestly attempting to falsify your hypothesis, rephrasing contrasting arguments, and so on
