>>14262713>This has to be a bait.I know, it's more like philosophy. Or just anything with logic and branching arguments like geometry.
>Exorcisms work too.I didn't claim the cathartic method works. I personally admit I think it's useful and a good step to making more sense out of a senseless mind. I simply suggested it might be useful.
>No concept introduced by him aside of the existence of the subconscious and preconscious are relevant today. Even then, his accounts of them are unfalsifiable (he did not believe in the scientific method), just made shit up.His ideas are relevant today, only because people think they are, and can perhaps test some of them in cognitive neuroscience. I will leave a link at the end.
If you're interested mysticism, read Jung. If you're interested in the subconscious, just read a modern cognitive psychology textbook. If you're interested in literature history, go ahead, read some Freud for fun.
Well, I mostly agree. But I really don't think literature history (whatever) is Freud. He apparently had a lot of clever ideas, which, his intellect being the focus, I think psychologists should appreciate. I don't think someone interested in their profession should be ignorant of something important in it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGAbZgIpPpcIs psychiatry made up? Are therapeutic techniques which provide relief quackery? I think that seems to be what you're getting at. In which case, if you are, I don't think you can relate to the sick and have empathy for them and thus are not qualified to talk on this matter.
I do hope I am wrong.
