>>14259517Why go to such concepts as space? Lets try something more down to earth, for example a book. This is a concept, before it was invented it was just a vague idea is some primitive humans mind, and it is in a way a new concept for a 3 year old which sees one for the first time in his lfe, but soon after, this concept gets much more defined with a ton of information, physical properties, purpose of use, the history of it, the implications of it and so on, I dare you to think of such well defined concept (which is also not a concept anymore) and not think about how it looks, how it feels in hand to touch and not recall any information(memory) about it which is visual or audible.
Most people don't think visually (or audibly) of space because it is not visible, they can't hear it and most have no clear understanding of what it actually is and therefore they come up with all kinds of bizarre bizarre thoughts regarding it (or other such things).
>>14259580>As with any internal experience, it can only be alluded to, not directly communicated. If you never experience keeping track of what you're thinking of without the help of something remotely tangible, there's no way I can explain it to you.Have to dissagree here, concious thought has to be represented in at least one of five senses, or it could be a reaction like surprise, shock, fear (and even these are based in five senses and memory), I don't understand how can you associate a conscious thought with anything else nut five senses, surely you don't have an extra sense (like birds can feel earths magnetic field). How can you experience something and not feel it or communicate with it? I am not talking for example about subconscious memory recall, think of "green" and some green objects or something/anything green might come up, this really works almost subconciously but this isn't really a thought it is just a mechanism (just like visual information from your eyes being interpreted as sight for you to see)
