>>14257063>you insist that there's a "need" for an explanation "better" than evolution.Only if you're not satisfied with this one. It would be silly to trade it for something worse, wouldn't it?
> You're clearly not concerned with whether it's the a valid theory or not a) because it's not my field of interest (I specialized into something else
b) I don't see inconsistencies with it other than I don't think selection is that important.
> Why don't we let anyone believe whatever they wantDon't we? We even allow jews all their pederastic practices because of religious freedoms and shit.
> The institutional push for Darwin's theory is..making good biologists. Countries who promote other theories suck at science, even though prayers might work once and again.
