>>14249945All available systems of universe modeling (big bang, quantum foam, string theory, ZFC, other set theory, chaos, game theory, etc) are built on a system of numeration that, at its origin, is based on self contradicting logic -0=0.
This core contradiction results in a deductive explosion via the law of explosion that allows infinite truths within a numeration process made to allow infinite patterns, infinite forms, and infinite physics models via infinite symbolic numerical representations (the simplest being binary, 0 and 1), so when you are numerically modeling, you are just playing memory games with shapes, not necessarily modeling natural reality.
The most reasonable physical explanation at a beginning of the universe is just a reflection of mathematically setting an absolute finite origin that is its own negation, a contradiction unto itself, resulting in a limit to the absolute smallest physicists could ever physically justify. This limit means physicist can just tell an illogical beginning myth most reasonably categorized as some random explosion or inflation, due to using numeration to arbitrarily differentiate 0 from 1 (big bang), preceded by an undefined state, -0=0 (singularity), because their physical model is just the result of a logical deductive explosion derived from contradictory origin point logic and an arbitrary separation of 100% from 0% via the illogical process of numeration. 1 is arbitrarily separated from 0 and 2 and all the other numbers via a recursive function to keep defining new values ad infinitum, so this creation myth can just be told over and over again for each new value, the "immortal infinity" is not actually a natural immortality, but a numerical immortality of having an upper bound that is boundless, another oxymoronic self contradictory value.
Arithmetic/Physics is either irrational and does not make measurable predictions about nature or nature is irrational and can evade quantification predictions infinitely.
