/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #14243764

182KiB, 750x750, 3ad652d7ff9f1af1c813438594cf0cff.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 20:04:03 2022 No.14243764 View Reply Original Report

Why are bird males decorative and females plain, but in humans it's the reverse? In both cases females have expensive gametes and act as sexual selectors, while males compete for them. Wouldn't it make more sense if human men wore make-up, bright clothes and twerked their asses?
Does it have something to do with bird females having heteromorphic chromosomes (ZW) like human males (XY), and bird males being homomorphic (ZZ) like human females (XX)? Or is that just a coincidence?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Peacock.jpg, 215KiB, 672x630

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 20:07:00 No.14243773 Report

Quoted By:

>>14243764
Yes

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 20:07:09 No.14243774 Report

Quoted By: >>14243788 >>14243835 >>14245606 >>14255051 >>14264328

>>14243764
>in humans it's the reverse
It isn't. There's nothing decorative about human females.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 20:14:15 No.14243788 Report

Quoted By: >>14243835 >>14243859 >>14244117 >>14264337

>>14243774
The question wasn't directed at faggots, my apologies for the implied heteronormativity.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 20:17:31 No.14243797 Report

Quoted By: >>14243831

women being flamboyant is somewhat cultural and developed out of being part of a harem
I base this on nothing

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Darius the great.jpg, 162KiB, 704x900

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 20:23:39 No.14243816 Report

Quoted By: >>14248240

>>14243764
>but in humans it's the reverse
Human males do also have the ability for quite a bit of decoration. The analogy to birds is human hair. Males in general have much more hair than females given that they can grow beards. Men have often used beards as decoration in many cultures for millennia, i.e. pic related.
>Wouldn't it make more sense if human men wore make-up, bright clothes and twerked their asses?
Men can and do wear bright clothes. The use of make-up is contextual for men as it's usually mostly for going on TV or something like that. Twerking asses is disgusting regardless of whether or it's a male or female. Twerking asses would count more as a body language thing however and not a decorative thing.

In the case of makeup; heavy use by women is a cope because they all look extremely plain without it. Whereas the features of men in a proper environment are much more pronounced and much more prominent and less plain in general without use of makeup. Lower body fat means that an active man will have more of his musculature exposed. A beard provides additional shape to the face. They can groom their hair just like women.

The problem you have here is your misunderstanding of human female behaviors which are intended for them to cope for being plain

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 20:30:39 No.14243830 Report

Quoted By:

>>14243764
>but in humans it's the reverse?
Is it? Bro, have you ever dated?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Chickens-Mating.png, 195KiB, 715x476

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 20:30:53 No.14243831 Report

Quoted By: >>14243870 >>14246274 >>14258246

>>14243797
Chicken have a harem of hens and one rooster, yet the rooster is still more flamboyant. Just one example, this arrangement is standard in non-monogamous birds.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 20:33:11 No.14243835 Report

Quoted By:

>>14243764
he's right
>>14243774

>>14243788
biblically speaking the men attract the women
a man living a righteous life does indeed experience that, women seem to like a lot a man's hair, a man's butt, his work ethic, his confidence, etc

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 20:37:36 No.14243850 Report

Quoted By: >>14243912

>>14243764
because human males have functions that are necessary for society to function. duh

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 20:39:10 No.14243859 Report

Quoted By:

>>14243788
he is right. faggit

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 20:42:09 No.14243870 Report

Quoted By: >>14246274

>>14243831
the virgin hen v the CHAD Rooster

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 20:52:57 No.14243906 Report

Quoted By: >>14243913

>>14243764
The partner that carries or has a bigger whole in raising the cubs goes for less risky mating strategies, to the point of being picky about partners.
The partner that just gives the seed and moves away never risks much.
In some birds where the male takes care of the eggs the roles are inverted.

Humans are a parabonding species because human cubs are very hard to raise. Thus our sexual dimorphism is less accentuated.

My hypothesis is: Human females conceal ovulation to make rape less effective (because cubs are super hard to raise). As a side effect they can afford to attract attention of a lot of males and then select one.
There are cultural aspects too.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 20:53:52 No.14243912 Report

Quoted By: >>14255060

>>14243850
Bird males manage to build elaborate nests and hunt worms all while wearing huge handicaps and risking attracting predators with their bright colours and loud songs. This proves that they are so fit they can take on extra burden.
Why are human males so pussy and only dress in comfy and practical clothes like a bunch of timid hens?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 20:54:08 No.14243913 Report

Quoted By: >>14243952

>>14243906
This is poorly written because I’m on my phone.
Check sapolsky lectures on human behavioral biology.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 21:00:40 No.14243927 Report

Quoted By: >>14243969

>>14243764
What your frankly midwitted brain regards as a contrast is actually a parallel. Human females are more attuned to colourful and aesthetic things etc., therefore it is part of their self-expression.
The same is true for bird females. Therefore, they are attracted to such.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 21:06:46 No.14243952 Report

Quoted By: >>14245963

>>14243913
I watched Sapolsky lectures, but this part didn't make much sense. Birds don't want to be raped by low quality males either. Ducks even evolved a corkscrew vagina with false tunnels as a rape defence. But still duck males are colourful and females camouflaged.

>Humans are a parabonding species because human cubs are very hard to raise. Thus our sexual dimorphism is less accentuated.
It's not just less accentuated, it's reversed. Human females still invest more in parenting while also expending extra energy on handicaps like high heels, long nails and constricting, pocketless clothes with stupid dangly bits.

>In some birds where the male takes care of the eggs the roles are inverted.
Yes, but in humans females "take care of the eggs", yet it's not inverted, that's the question - why?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 21:13:34 No.14243969 Report

Quoted By:

>>14243927
Are you saying if bird females had the ability to use make-up they would start decorating themselves and start perceiving flamboyant males as gay?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 22:22:49 No.14244117 Report

Quoted By: >>14244142

>>14243788
They don't have any special "ornamental" features, tard. The closest thing they have is clothing and makeup to try to make themselves more appealing artificially, but if the females of other species were smart enough to make themselves artificially more attractive to high quality mates, they'd probably be doing it, too.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 22:24:15 No.14244120 Report

Quoted By: >>14244139

>>14243764
Your premise is off. What you're saying is

>bird males pretty, bird females not, in humans this is the reverse

But you're looking at the question backwards. It IS the same in birds and humans, they just do it differently. Males of almost all animals need to show off their genetic fitness. Birds get colorful, men get strong, but it's an expression of the same thing. Bird males are NOT the fairer sex. Female birds are still smaller, weaker, have softer flesh and feathers. They're just not as colorful. But bird females are still feminine it's not the opposite at all birds just have a different strategy of doing the same thing

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 22:32:55 No.14244139 Report

Quoted By:

>>14244120
It depends on the species.
For many bird species, like birds of prey, females are the bigger dominant sex, and the couple pair bonds and raises the offspring together for life.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO christina-hendricks-mad-men-joan.jpg, 1MiB, 1500x2250

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 22:33:09 No.14244142 Report

Quoted By: >>14244157 >>14244272

>>14244117

human females are the only mammals with large permanently swollen breasts. These are an expensive display designed to attract attention like a peacocks tail.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 22:37:37 No.14244153 Report

Quoted By:

>>14243764
Humans are mammals, Birds are birds, they're on another level in terms of sexual dimorphism. A male elephant, tiger or dog doesn't look anymore flamboyant and colorful than his female counterpart.

Makeup and colourful clothing aren't physical, evolved traits. They're just stuffs humans invented and wear. Physically, the human female is about as plain as the human male.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1549738503459.png, 22KiB, 276x379

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 22:40:10 No.14244156 Report

Quoted By: >>14244169

Human beings have not even reached our final form for sexual dimorphism.
In a few years we, and all our children, will all be genetically modified to make men very small, lean, athletic, and cute, and women tall, thick, and superfecund.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 22:41:12 No.14244157 Report

Quoted By:

>>14244142
not that expensive desu

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 22:48:09 No.14244169 Report

Quoted By: >>14244190

>>14244156
What kind of animal species fit your picture? I like girls who are bigger than me, but even in creating fantasy humanoid races, this doesn't make sense because males are bigger across almost the whole animal kingdom and it's hard to find any justification for it—but if the fantasy race were half-animal of a creature that has larger females than males irl, it would make sense and work in favor of my Amazon girl kink. Also, what factors lead to female animals being bigger than males?

Please take this question very seriously these are the kinds of important questions science is made for

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1632170278247.jpg, 116KiB, 902x1024

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 23:00:23 No.14244190 Report

Quoted By: >>14244218

>>14244169
>What kind of animal species fit your picture? I like girls who are bigger than me, but even in creating fantasy humanoid races, this doesn't make sense because males are bigger across almost the whole animal kingdom
Males are larger than females in only about ~2% of animal species. Females are larger in about 86% of species, and the rest are about the same size. So no, males are not "bigger across almost the whole animal kingdom", they are SMALLER for almost all species of animal, both vertebrates and invertebrates, as well as water vs land, etc. Males are almost always smaller than females. So to answer your question "what kind of animal fits your picture", pretty much all of them.
If you mean that for mammals males are almost always bigger, then you're correct, but even then somewhere between 5-15% of mammals the females are larger than the males. If we were to turn humans into such a species it would be slightly rare for mammals but not unheard of. If you want examples of mammals where the females are larger than males, just look at rabbits, whales (the female blue whale is the larger animal that has ever existed), bats, shrews, many species of shrews, spotted hyenas, spider monkeys, flying squirrels, some species of hippopotamus, mongoose, ross seals, tapirs, grey whales, sperm whales, manatees, various species of mice, dikdiks, okapis, etc. There are many mammal species where the females are bigger than males, adding humans to that list wouldn't be that big of a deal.
Also, most importantly, the justification for this is not just driven by evolutionary biological arguments, but economic and sociological reasoning. In the modern, industrialized environment, it makes far more sense to structure society around a matriarchy with big females and small males. It makes more sense from an economic as well as social position. If you want me to elaborate more I will.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 23:18:44 No.14244218 Report

Quoted By: >>14244228

>>14244190
Oh sorry I quickly deleted my comment because I thought /an/ would be a better place for the question

>>>/an/4078316

Your insight is interesting and appreciated

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 23:20:25 No.14244221 Report

Quoted By: >>14244234 >>14244237

>>14243764
Birds have to be sexualy selected because males can't really force themselves on females thanks to flying.
Mammals don't have this problem. Penises are fundamentally designed so that the cunt doesn't have a choice.

Viruses don't exist

Viruses don't exist Fri 18 Feb 2022 23:21:49 No.14244225 Report

Quoted By:

>>14243764
it has to do with Christian morality enforced by globohomo. they turn upside down everything.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 23:24:47 No.14244228 Report

Quoted By: >>14244261

>>14244218
I answered you there on /an/ and I'll be back to answer anything here or there in like ~30 minutes

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO amStUYk.jpg, 283KiB, 1024x683

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 23:27:53 No.14244234 Report

Quoted By:

>>14244221
Ducks are flying just fine.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 23:28:50 No.14244237 Report

Quoted By: >>14261133

>>14244221
>Birds have to be sexualy selected because males can't really force themselves on females thanks to flying.
Ducks?
>Mammals don't have this problem.
They can just run tho. Sure female mammals generally run slower than male mammals, but the same is true when it comes to flying for any bird species with relatively larger males.
If a peregrine falcon can dive 200+ mph to catch some grub, it can dive 200+ mph to catch some bird pussy too

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 23:49:21 No.14244261 Report

Quoted By: >>14244301

>>14244228
Mostly I just wanna know the basic main evolutionary/biological factors that lead to one sex being physically bigger than the other, in either direction.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 5324234.jpg, 304KiB, 1200x1118

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 23:59:07 No.14244272 Report

Quoted By: >>14245558

>>14244142
>human females are the only mammals with large permanently swollen breasts
Most women have ugly tits, and if you lived in a prehistoric society where women walk around with their saggy tits out on display 100% of the time feeding babies, you would probably consider them altogether unremarkable. They're not comparable to ridiculous male adaptations like antlers or peakcock tails. Female baboons have ridiculous sexually dimorphic adaptations on par with peacocks. Human females don't.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 19 Feb 2022 00:15:07 No.14244301 Report

Quoted By:

>>14244261
There are many composite factors that go into it.
In brief, males get bigger if they have to physically fight for females, females get bigger in pretty much all other situations, because larger females have greater fecundity and thus can make more copies of their genes (the fecundity advantage hypothesis, one of the three pillars of evolutionary biology), whereas large males do not have fecundity advantages, they have sexual advantages (male on male competition).

However, males may have to fight each other while still being smaller than females, there are many species where males compete in fights for mating but are still smaller than females. There probably are some species where males don't fight but are bigger than females, but this is very very very rare, I can not think of a single example other than modern humans. (which I obviously have a problem with, I want to make human males small and human females big).

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 19 Feb 2022 11:33:48 No.14245538 Report

Quoted By:

You're wrong. It's men who are the "decorative" ones. You need to be financially successful or/and Chad in this world.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 47788D5C-E0BC-4E77-893F-C378B8DB (...).gif, 1MiB, 606x640

Anonymous Sat 19 Feb 2022 11:45:59 No.14245558 Report

Quoted By: >>14245568 >>14247789

>>14244272
>le reddit science
I have seen dozens of bare breasts irl and thousands online, yet somehow I still get hard just thinking about them. Faggot

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 19 Feb 2022 11:54:08 No.14245568 Report

Quoted By:

>>14245558
Absolute lack of comprehension. Is the average /soi/ poster even human?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 19 Feb 2022 12:06:24 No.14245592 Report

Quoted By:

>>14243764
>but in humans it's the reverse?
Lolwut. Human females don't have colorful plumage or manes. What decoration do they have?
>In both cases females have expensive gametes
Females are born with all the eggs they will need in life. Sperm cells are smaller than oocytes but there are 100 million of them in one ejaculation compared to one egg cell during ovulation. This is why after sex males have a refractory period. After ejaculation males feel tired and sluggish and require additional time before they can go again. Meanwhile, females can keep going as much as they please. This is why it's becoming common practice for women to put their partners in chastity cages so the women aren't left dissatisfied. Ejaculate has a lot of protein and important nutrients like zinc which is lost from the body.
>while males compete for them
Wrong. Maybe that's how it feels for lower value males but love and attraction do not have any rhyme or reason.
>Wouldn't it make more sense if human men wore make-up, bright clothes and twerked their asses?
You made a good point here. It would make most sense if men and women both tried to attract the opposite sex. And actually women do find men that can dance well attractive. But the reason that's not the case is because sexist beliefs that objectify women. Women are the object of attraction to men being the subject. This is what gender studies analyzes and the discrepancy that feminists have been trying to call attention to.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 19 Feb 2022 12:13:51 No.14245606 Report

Quoted By: >>14245620

>>14243774
What about OP's pic

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 19 Feb 2022 12:20:56 No.14245620 Report

Quoted By: >>14245649 >>14254405

>>14245606
The dress is not a part of her natural appearance, anon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 19 Feb 2022 12:40:15 No.14245649 Report

Quoted By: >>14245655

>>14245620
Behaviour is just an extension of our phenotype. Dawkins wrote about it 40 years ago in his book "The Extended Phenotype."
Think of nests that birds build, or ant hills, or beaver dams. Those structures are just as heritable as actual bodies. There is no hard line between an organism and its environment when it comes to genetics and memetics.
Whether it's part of "natural" appearance or not doesn't matter for evolutionary strategy. Only functionality matters.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 19 Feb 2022 12:47:11 No.14245655 Report

Quoted By: >>14247011

>>14245649
I glad you fully agree with me that females don't have any outstanding decorative features.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 19 Feb 2022 15:11:01 No.14245963 Report

Quoted By: >>14245993 >>14258280 >>14261473

>>14243764
>Why are bird males decorative and females plain, but in humans it's the reverse?
Most birds don't have ornamental features. Breast fat in women isn't ornamental. If the nipple moves outward it's easier for a baby to reach and thus the baby can be held in a more horizontal position and closer to the woman's center of gravity. They possibly also serve as a cushion if she falls with baby in hand.

>>14243952
>ducks even evolved a corkscrew vagina with false tunnels as a rape defence
If this designed feature relied on evolution it would be impossible. The fake channels would also block desirable sperm. There are two components to this intelligently designed system: these fake channels and the ability to open the correct ones. Evolution cannot evolve two components at the same time to achieve an end result that is only beneficial when the two components are complete and functional. It's completely against evolutionary theory to evolve useless things that only become useful once the system is functional after thousands of generations.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 19 Feb 2022 15:22:56 No.14245993 Report

Quoted By: >>14246647

>>14245963
>The fake channels would also block desirable sperm.
Not if the same male busts in you repeatedly (which is unlikely in the case of rape). You sound literally retarded.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Berman2.gif, 4KiB, 450x278

Anonymous Sat 19 Feb 2022 15:29:42 No.14246011 Report

Quoted By: >>14258286

>>14243764
humans are MOSTLY socially monogamous hence no extremes like in peacocks. when a species is mostly 1 male mates with 1 female there is no strong selection of difference between males and females. for example human males are only 2%-10% (depending on ethnic group) taller than females while in some mammals it's 300%

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 19 Feb 2022 17:21:20 No.14246274 Report

Quoted By: >>14247194

>>14243831
>>14243870
I never understood how junction of cloacas work
Like, in the position in that pic, how do the cloacas come into contact?
I'd figure the easiest way to do it would be for the birds to face away from each other and touch their hinds together

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO king louis.jpg, 84KiB, 404x600

Anonymous Sat 19 Feb 2022 17:24:07 No.14246284 Report

Quoted By:

>>14243764
men did used to dress up before the industrial revolution

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 19 Feb 2022 17:26:58 No.14246294 Report

Quoted By: >>14255551

>>14243764
because of monogamy
t. biology phd student

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 19 Feb 2022 19:29:40 No.14246647 Report

Quoted By: >>14247024

>>14245993
>Not if the same male busts in you repeatedly.
No of course it would still block. It doesn't magically stop blocking if the duck does it more than once.
You've probably never had sex but there is this thing called a refractory period too which is intentionally meant to prevent males from busting a nut repeatedly. You are also implying this nonsense idea that birds instinctively know they have to go back and try again to magically defeat the blocking mechanism...
>unlikely in the case of rape
>he unironically must pretend animals don't rape as many times as they want
>he unironically must pretend animals don't frequently gang rape as many times as they want
Is this cope or do you actually think this is how it works?
>You sound literally retarded
Let's see who's retarded? if females simply have to allow desirable males to bust a nut repeatedly then why do females even have the ability to selectively allow certain sperm??? It would be entirely unnecessary yet there it is, retard. I would have asked you for a source to your bullshit implication that desirable males instinctively know they must "repeatedly" drop loads into females to magically overcome the blocking mechanism but I know you made it up since this sperm-selection feature exists.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 19 Feb 2022 20:46:02 No.14247011 Report

Quoted By: >>14247031

>>14245655
Your brain is an outstandingly decorative feature.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 19 Feb 2022 20:49:18 No.14247024 Report

Quoted By: >>14248173

>>14246647
>No of course it would still block.
It's not a fool-proof blocking mechanism, you mouth breather, and I'm not a duck expert, but I would guess how much it blocks also depends on the female's level of stress. You sure are fucking stupid.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 19 Feb 2022 20:50:34 No.14247031 Report

Quoted By:

>>14247011
I accept your full and direct concession. Not sure what referencing King Midwit Dawkins was supposed to accomplish.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO birdsex.png, 8KiB, 557x495

Anonymous Sat 19 Feb 2022 21:24:12 No.14247194 Report

Quoted By: >>14249107 >>14255098

>>14246274
I've observed my parrots fuck from up close, and basically they are really flexible. The female arches her back so that her cloaca is facing almost upwards. The male crunches his torso to meet it. They do it slightly sideways to make room for the tails.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 20 Feb 2022 00:09:52 No.14247789 Report

Quoted By: >>14247835

>>14245558
this. i will never get tired of tits.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot 2022-02-20 at 00-19-1 (...).png, 3MiB, 1193x848

Anonymous Sun 20 Feb 2022 00:22:18 No.14247835 Report

Quoted By: >>14255019

>>14247789
You would if everyone walked around naked. Do you think guys from this tribe still care about tits any more than faces or hands or any other exposed feminine features?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 20 Feb 2022 00:35:03 No.14247867 Report

Quoted By:

Wouldn't a mammal comparison be more appropriate?

Most mammals males compete with each other physically for females. In today's world, males compete with each other economically for females.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 20 Feb 2022 02:42:03 No.14248173 Report

Quoted By: >>14249126

>>14247024
>It's not a fool-proof blocking mechanism
The active selection and passive blockage system works like 97% of the time to prevent or allow sperm depending on what the female duck wants. Your idea the desirable male duck just has to try repeatedly to magically overcome the blocking mechanism remains total bullshit.
>and I'm not a duck expert
Admitting this obvious fact does not give you a pass to pull things completely out of your ass and pretend they're valid after I easily debunk them.
>but I would guess how much it blocks also depends on the female's level of stress
This is the active selection mechanism I was talking about, not the passive blocking mechanism via fake channels you brought up. You're moving goalposts. The fake channel sperm blocking mechanism would still block desirable male sperm if there was not also a selective mechanism in place, and it remains nonsense that evolution would develop both of these at the same time.
>You sure are fucking stupid
Awww little kiddie has to resort to insults again because he's too stupid to win an argument...

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 20 Feb 2022 03:21:05 No.14248240 Report

Quoted By: >>14249326 >>14255523

>>14243816
Women have more head hair though

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 20 Feb 2022 12:31:13 No.14249107 Report

Quoted By:

>>14247194
CUTE!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 20 Feb 2022 12:41:37 No.14249126 Report

Quoted By: >>14254354

>>14248173
>The active selection and passive blockage system works like 97% of the time
Even if I grant you that, my point still obviously holds consider they form seasonal bonds and fuck repeatedly. You're genuinely a mouth-breathing retard.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 20 Feb 2022 14:30:43 No.14249326 Report

Quoted By:

>>14248240
no they don't they just cut it longer, which is cultural

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 20 Feb 2022 16:05:31 No.14249544 Report

Quoted By: >>14251406

>>14243764
Actually the cause is a lot simpler. Take away the BIC razors, shampoo,hair dyes,expensive haircuts, wigs,plastic surgery and makeup fora few months and then have another look.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 21 Feb 2022 01:37:05 No.14251406 Report

Quoted By: >>14251545 >>14255174

>>14249544
Those things are part of our heritable/integrated environment. That's like saying "take away all trees and observe that beavers don't actually build dams any more than foxes build dams."
Having a desire to use make-up, seeking it out etc is the core thing here. Actual behaviour and outcomes are just symptoms downstream from it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 21 Feb 2022 02:52:48 No.14251545 Report

Quoted By:

>>14251406
yeah but beavers still look different from foxes
male peacocks will still be more deocrative than female peacocks

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO toothy.jpg, 157KiB, 962x641

Anonymous Mon 21 Feb 2022 11:03:26 No.14252333 Report

Quoted By: >>14264295 >>14266477

>>14243764
>in humans it's the reverse
Cultural traditions are not necessarily human universals. Consider the lads in pic related. This is part of some traditional festival where the unmarried men all get dressed up and painted and dance, while showing off what good teeth they have. The girls watch and pick husbands. It's exactly like watching a lek in birds.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Feb 2022 00:26:13 No.14254354 Report

Quoted By:

>>14249126
>Even if I grant you that
It's true, little kiddie
>my point still obviously holds consider they form seasonal bonds and fuck repeatedly
What an absolutely desperate goalpost move. Repeatedly fucking enough to magically overcome the fake channels somehow works because they (allegedly, I know you're making this up again) fuck repeatedly over a SEASON?? HAHAHA! Please explain how having sex multiple times over a season magically overcomes the blocking mechanism without the selection mechanism being present. I want to laugh at your stupidity more. In fact, just prove it. Give a source that says they fuck repeatedly, the time between sessions, and how this repetition could overcome a blocking mechanism without the active selection mechanism also being present.
Not to mention in your infinite stupidity you don't realize you have now claimed that fucking "over a season" can overcome the passive blocking mechanism, meaning being raped over the season would overcome it too, rendering your original point worthless where you said rapists ducks don't have the same access that is required to overcome the mechanism... 40% of attempts of impregnation are forced "OVER THE SEASON" yet the system is 97% effective. It's simply impossible to maintain your nonsense bullshit that repetition overcomes the mechanism. You have yet to even explain how repetition overcomes it, and now also BTFO'd via being shown that repetition from rapists doesn't overcome it.
>You're genuinely a mouth-breathing retard
It's amazing that people as dumb as you are allowed to post on /sci/ and you carry on in your complete ignorance without a care in the world. You've already directly proven yourself wrong in literally 4 sentences.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Feb 2022 00:42:21 No.14254405 Report

Quoted By:

>>14245620
But the decorative personality is part of her along with all females.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Feb 2022 05:40:16 No.14255006 Report

Quoted By:

Men eat more calories
Men are leaner
Men are taller
Men need more money
Men need to be smarter
Men constantly need to entertain
Men don't choose
Good looking Men work less to find a female

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Capture.png, 204KiB, 252x273

Anonymous Tue 22 Feb 2022 05:50:25 No.14255019 Report

Quoted By:

>>14247835
mood

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Feb 2022 06:10:09 No.14255051 Report

Quoted By:

>>14243774
Titties and ass, bigger hair, larger lips, etc.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Feb 2022 06:18:34 No.14255060 Report

Quoted By:

>>14243912
Have you never seen how rock stars, rappers, and PUAs tend to dress?
You are just confused by the fact you live in a puritan society.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Feb 2022 06:28:18 No.14255068 Report

Quoted By:

>>14243764
>females have expensive gametes and act as sexual selectors

Men don't pick their sexual partners based on how flashy and expensive their clothing is. Nobody swipes left on a hot girl because her clothes are cheap and boring. Women use jewelry and expensive clothing to flaunt their wealth to each other not to attract male sex partners.

El Arcón

El Arcón Tue 22 Feb 2022 06:46:15 No.14255081 Report

Quoted By: >>14262807

>>14243764
>twerk
If this had been the ugly spastic jerking that it is now several years ago, it never would have caught on.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Feb 2022 07:01:52 No.14255098 Report

Quoted By:

>>14247194
Do tits do it the same way? Is that an anatomically correct drawing of tit fucking?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Feb 2022 07:04:20 No.14255107 Report

Quoted By:

I'll give you the answer anon:

Patriarchy

In nature, male compete for females and with each other, but in patriarchy, everything is designed to reduce competition among males. Everything is designed so most males have a female and reproduce. Everything is designed so the roles are reverse and FEMALES compete for the attention of males

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Feb 2022 07:22:14 No.14255133 Report

Quoted By:

>>14243764
Because men have to hunt for food while male birds often don't raise the young at all.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Feb 2022 07:35:25 No.14255146 Report

Quoted By: >>14258877

>Women are the sexual selectors
Not until recently. Men had a monopoly on power. Marriages were arranged and women were barred from positions of power.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Feb 2022 08:07:23 No.14255174 Report

Quoted By:

>>14251406
Up until a couple hundred years ago the vast majority of the human population didn't have access to these things.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Feb 2022 09:19:25 No.14255238 Report

Quoted By:

>not a single answer to the question
I think the little retard kikes are trying to get me to divulge some real knowledge

Send me some slaves, maybe I'll tell you, it's not terribly important.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Feb 2022 09:21:15 No.14255243 Report

Quoted By: >>14255263

>>14243764
Maybe you should start by asking yourself why the is a male/female archetype for most life on earth

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Feb 2022 09:39:04 No.14255263 Report

Quoted By: >>14255374 >>14256901 >>14262808

>>14255243
Consciousness didn't want to be alone. So it split itself into two equal parts. They could have been identical but instead the two parts were given their own aesthetics so each part could have a greater attraction to the other part. Although this template varies by species, this is the general pattern it follows.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Feb 2022 11:02:44 No.14255341 Report

Quoted By: >>14256901

>>14243764
Your first mistake is treating all humans as the same species. There are over 1400 species of horses on the planet. 2200 species of bats. Humans are not all humans. Generally, In "whites" the female picks a male, in blacks the male picks a female. But humans outnumber horses so we have thousands of more species to understand.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Feb 2022 11:22:35 No.14255374 Report

Quoted By:

>>14255263
>Consciousness didn't want to be alone. So it split itself into two equal parts
Stupid take. There's no lonlier feeling in the world than trying to establish true connection with a hole, only to find out over and over again that all holes are basically animals.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Feb 2022 13:07:41 No.14255523 Report

Quoted By: >>14255529 >>14256901

>>14248240
Yes, but make hair is an incredibly strong marker for fitness.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Feb 2022 13:10:21 No.14255529 Report

Quoted By:

>>14255523
Male hair in humans*

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1200px-Hylobates_lar_pair_of_whi (...).jpg, 191KiB, 1200x799

Anonymous Tue 22 Feb 2022 13:19:04 No.14255551 Report

Quoted By: >>14258857 >>14258883

>>14246294
monogamous species like gibbons have no size difference between sexes, humans do have size differences.
also can you tell us why nature decided male gibbons should black while female gibbons should be blond, mr PHD?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Feb 2022 21:19:57 No.14256901 Report

Quoted By:

>>14255341
>>14255523
>>14255263
why are you all so retarded spouting these psychotic lies off the top of your empty heads

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 23 Feb 2022 11:10:29 No.14258246 Report

Quoted By:

>>14243831
except originally chicken are usually monogamous even though roosters don't refuse a harem. and the reason for the dimorphism is that the male bird acts as bait to lure predators away from the broody female. check the alleged ancestor of our chicken, the red junglefowl: rooster is a miniature version of the usual domestic version while the hen looks almost like a pheasant hen, no colors or comb or wattle because she must hatch the chicks on the ground.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 23 Feb 2022 11:40:57 No.14258280 Report

Quoted By: >>14260560

>>14245963
>There are two components to this intelligently designed system
there are much more than 2 component you absolute brainlet, just like in every component of every living being, holy dunning–kruger go read how evolution works before posting this shit

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 23 Feb 2022 11:43:55 No.14258286 Report

Quoted By:

>>14246011
Look at her stance, she in NOT happy about theyre "power dynamic". Shes very concerned about her.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 23 Feb 2022 16:41:21 No.14258857 Report

Quoted By:

>>14255551
That's depends on the species of gibbon. The ones in your picture are not a species where colouring depends on sex, both males and females can be white or dark.
I don't really know why, but the fact that it varies so much from species to species makes me think there's no selective reason for it. Its just stochastic variation.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 23 Feb 2022 16:48:55 No.14258867 Report

Quoted By: >>14260566 >>14262415

>>14243764
Human males are also decorative. We have broad shoulders, deep voices, and visible body hair. We also tend to show off our ability to provide for and take care of a family - that's why women like seeing men working on cars or holding babies.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 23 Feb 2022 16:52:54 No.14258877 Report

Quoted By:

>>14255146
Depended where. In colonial America for example, parents selected prospective mates but each could accept or turn down their possible partner.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 23 Feb 2022 16:55:31 No.14258883 Report

Quoted By:

>>14255551
Human size differences are way, way smaller than those in highly dimorphous species. Average female height worldwide is 5'3. For men it's like 5'7.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 24 Feb 2022 06:25:50 No.14260560 Report

Quoted By: >>14261522

>>14258280
>there are much more than 2 component you absolute brainlet
infantile strawman. I never said there are only 2. I implied there are 2 relevant ones. At least the other retard could grasp that, learn from him.
>holy dunning–kruger
what are the other relevant components then?
>go read how evolution works before posting this shit
yawn. As always you evolutiontards attack the understanding via strawman, fail at that, and ignore the argument. Why is this your go to tactic? Does pretending I know less than you about evolution somehow change the point I made that the other retard could not refute?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 24 Feb 2022 06:35:03 No.14260566 Report

Quoted By: >>14261731

>>14258867
>Human males are also decorative. We have broad shoulders, deep voices, and visible body hair
These aren't decorative features they all serve a functional purpose. Women almost universally don't like back hair on men btw.
The most interesting example in males is that masculine male faces are probably not ornamental either. However I'm not aware of a masculine face serving a functional purpose.
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-01-facial-masculinity-sexual-ornament-quality.html

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 24 Feb 2022 15:33:40 No.14261133 Report

Quoted By:

>>14244237
trans females run just as fast as men tho.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 24 Feb 2022 19:37:30 No.14261473 Report

Quoted By: >>14261938

>>14245963
why didn't the intelligent designer remover rape behavior from the minds of ducks instead of making maze vaginas? sounds like this "intelligent" designer is retarded that always comes up with retarded second hand solutions instead of addressing the problem head on

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 24 Feb 2022 20:11:39 No.14261522 Report

Quoted By: >>14261938

>>14260560
>I never said there are only 2.
So how many are there?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 24 Feb 2022 22:16:09 No.14261731 Report

Quoted By: >>14261955 >>14262492

>>14260566
Androgenic hair shows that a man has plenty of testosterone and is adequately healthy. It's not just for warmth.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 25 Feb 2022 00:38:16 No.14261938 Report

Quoted By: >>14262356 >>14263665

>>14261473
>why didn't the intelligent designer remover rape behavior from the minds of ducks instead of making maze vaginas?
"variety"... artists and designers come up with different solutions on something all the time. Would you prefer having a penis that looks like a creepy disgusting duck penis because technically a maze vagina is better engineered to prevent unwanted pregnancy?
>sounds like this "intelligent" designer is retarded that always comes up with retarded second hand solutions
This design is unique to ducks. If your schizo babble were true then why do retarded evolutioncucks say rape is a very good strategy for gene propagation that rivals or even surpasses voluntary copulation? Is rape NOT a good strategy for gene propagation?? It wouldn't make sense if animals didn't attempt forced copulation. You'd cry the intelligent designer SHOULD have this programming in a survival of the fittest scenario and wonder why it was missing if it weren't there. You're making a very large contradiction. Explain.
>comes up with retarded solutions instead of addressing the problem head on
No, not whatsoever little kiddie. The intelligent designer made all genes perfect at inception. There was no problem that needed to be addressed head on. No female wanted to avoid any male such as yourself at that stage. It makes perfect sense. If every organism in a population had perfect genes, why the heck would selection be be beneficial?
Due to entropy being introduced from man's free will, genes began to degrade over time and females' selection strategies prevailed. Humans and animals still found the same things attractive from before there was a biological success strategy involved in attraction of course...

>inb4 y include da rape deterrence sysdem if da genes be purfect?
Why do you wear a seatbelt if you've never been in a car crash?

>>14261522
There are 2 relevant ones in the sperm-blocking designed system.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 25 Feb 2022 00:46:21 No.14261955 Report

Quoted By:

>>14261731
>Androgenic hair shows that a man has plenty of testosterone and is adequately healthy. It's not just for warmth.
Sure. But if there is utility to a feature, or an aspect of a feature, it's not a biological ornament by definition. A feature can both be a fitness indicator and also serve a purpose. Plenty of animals do have purely ornamental features or aspects of features but I don't think humans have any unless you want to include useless behavior that impresses the opposite sex.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 25 Feb 2022 00:53:09 No.14261963 Report

Quoted By: >>14262398

>>14243764

Have you seen what the average woman without make-up in her 20s looks like. It's grim. It's for the best that the female of our species does her best to paint her face, don attractive clothes, and learn as many tricks are they possible can to make themselves more flattering in appearance and form than what they actually are.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 25 Feb 2022 07:40:25 No.14262356 Report

Quoted By: >>14263090

>>14261938
>There are 2 relevant ones in the sperm-blocking designed system.
No, no, no
You said:
>There are two components to this intelligently designed system
Then anon said:
>there are much more than 2 component you absolute brainlet
Then you said:
>I never said there are only 2
And now you're saying:
>There are 2 relevant ones
So, name a few less relevant ones.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO main-qimg-a1d98c01213fbad7935cf9 (...).jpg, 568KiB, 1057x1024

Anonymous Fri 25 Feb 2022 08:31:06 No.14262398 Report

Quoted By: >>14262803

>>14261963
At least women can be helped by make-up. Men are ugly with or without it. So ugly, in fact, that women prefer looking at other women in their media, and the only exceptions are K-pop boy bands who look like girls. There's no demand for male models, porn stars etc because no one wants to look at repulsive overgrown brow ridges, big noses and primitive jaws. Those features are only prized in as much as their brute strength can be used for labour or defence, preferably out of sight.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 25 Feb 2022 08:40:09 No.14262415 Report

Quoted By:

>>14258867
Those features are not decorative, they are scary. That's why hairy, burly men are compared to gorillas or bears. They look like aggressive predators, and the only reason anyone stares is out of shock and horror, to make sure they can react quickly when the man chimps out and starts running at them.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 25 Feb 2022 10:12:00 No.14262492 Report

Quoted By:

>>14261731
>Androgenic hair shows that a man has plenty of testosterone
Lol no it doesn't. There are many men with healthy endocrine systems that aren't that hairy.
>adequately healthy
Body hair is unhygienic and a breeding ground for parasites.
>It's not just for warmth.
Which is why humans have been shedding body hair over millennia. There is little need for body hair to provide warmth for humans in Africa. On the contrary, there is greater need to keep cool.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 25 Feb 2022 15:13:22 No.14262779 Report

Quoted By:

>>14243764
In birds colorful or burdensome decoration serves as an honest signal of male fitness.

In human males adult height, facial symmetry and social status serve this purpose.

In human females beauty is again a signal for physical fitness (and fitness of offspring) but also for youth (and likelihood of surviving pregnancy and childbirth). Males need to discriminate between potential mates when they have options because male parental care is important for offspring survival.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 25 Feb 2022 15:29:56 No.14262803 Report

Quoted By: >>14264338 >>14266756

>>14262398
>t. pedo femcel
You sure are fucking obsessed.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 25 Feb 2022 15:31:26 No.14262807 Report

Quoted By:

>>14255081
Kill yourself

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 25 Feb 2022 15:32:42 No.14262808 Report

Quoted By:

>>14255263
Dumbest post of the year

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO yfw.jpg, 94KiB, 601x508

Anonymous Fri 25 Feb 2022 16:54:54 No.14262936 Report

Quoted By:

>Dumbest post of the year

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 25 Feb 2022 17:55:32 No.14263090 Report

Quoted By: >>14263163

>>14262356
>No, no, no
Yes, yes, yes. That and all others are correct statements I made.
>And now you're saying:
Saying there are two encompasses the fact that there are two relevant ones and other less relevant ones. I'm not saying something "different" now.... We call US politics a two party system but guess what? There are 100+ other parties. GASP!!! How can that possibly be? Is everyone who calls it a two party system a dunning kruger retard who knows nothing of politics because technically there are more than 2 parties???
>So, name a few less relevant ones.
here they are: www.google.com

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 25 Feb 2022 18:36:06 No.14263163 Report

Quoted By: >>14263572

>>14263090
>www.google.com
Total & Epic defeat.
Never post here again. It's embarrassing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 25 Feb 2022 23:07:44 No.14263572 Report

Quoted By: >>14264290

>>14263163
>seething
why in the hell would I entertain your stupid question? Look it up yourself you midwit. Your smartass responses are all the proof I need that you don't agree with me anyway so there is no authentic reason you asked in the first place, so I didn't give you an authentic answer.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 26 Feb 2022 00:03:05 No.14263665 Report

Quoted By: >>14264071 >>14264318

>>14261938
>"variety"... artists and designers
pure imagination. i can show you guys a random log of shit, pure chaos, etc and you will still claim design
>say rape is a very good strategy for gene propagation that rivals or even surpasses voluntary copulation? Is rape NOT a good strategy for gene propagation?? It wouldn't make sense if animals didn't attempt forced copulation.
it's not about rape, it's about conflict between sexes and there are balances. rape doesn't happen in all species, it happens in species that have high sexual selection and high dimorphism.
>the designer made rape
O merciful designer. thanks for creating another way of suffering
> The intelligent designer made all genes perfect at inception.
i guess the intelligent designer was too retarded to disable radiation, entropy and make transcription more accurate
>If every organism in a population had perfect genes, why the heck would selection be be beneficial?
yeah WHY would the designer do this? why go though all this effort? ID proponents claim that their hypothesis answers the questions of purposefulness in nature. yet if you extend their scrutiny of nature to the designer it still doesn't make any sense. in the same way you can say "why would nature do X" i can also say why would the designer do X. why would the designer create a random fuckk off brown dwarf millions of light years away? why did he create a random 100m radius rock orbiting earth? why would the creator create a random useless flavonoid then create the pathway to break it down? even if you treat ID the same way you treat any other hypothesis, it still offers no advantages over other ones except maybe it makes you feel good about yourself

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 26 Feb 2022 05:20:50 No.14264071 Report

Quoted By:

>>14263665
>pure imagination. i can show you guys a random log of shit, pure chaos, etc and you will still claim design
Give even a single example of this nonsense
>it's not about rape, it's about conflict between sexes and there are balances. rape doesn't happen in all species, it happens in species that have
Did you have a point? Rape is a good strategy in a survival of the fittest scenario. You are just babbling because you have nothing of substance to say
>O merciful designer. thanks for creating another way of suffering
Human on human rape is a creation of humans.
>disable radiation, entropy and make transcription more accurate
Do you even hear yourself talk? "disable radiation"... wtf does that even mean? Fundamentally redesign the universe to remove radiation/entropy to help soothe your delicate fee fees? Transcription is insanely accurate too. You would complain for anything short of humans and all life being immortal
>yeah WHY would the designer do this? why go though all this effort?
What?? You're asking why would he make things originally perfect???? Again, you're just babbling a bunch of nonsense.
>ID proponents claim that their hypothesis answers the questions of purposefulness in nature. yet if you extend their scrutiny of nature to the designer it still doesn't make any sense
Just bc you don't understand something doesn't mean it doesn't make sense.
>in the same way you can say "why would nature do X" i can also say why would the designer do X. why would the designer create a random fuckk off brown dwarf millions of light years away? why did he create ...
No, I'm asking HOW evolution could do X. Nobody is asking "why" "nature" "did X" except your strawmen. So far the answer is: it can't. I don't ask "why nature did X" because for 99.99999999%+ of things I don't believe "nature" is responsible for it. What does that even mean?
>except maybe it makes you feel good about yourself
The projection is off the charts

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 26 Feb 2022 09:19:20 No.14264290 Report

Quoted By: >>14266322

>>14263572
>why in the hell would I entertain your stupid question?
Because you're an absolute failure. You can't prove your ridiculous claim. So you resort to moving goalposts and ad hominems. Nobody cares if you list 2 or more components. You even failed to grasp that the point was about ID, not the number of components could or should have. This is a science board. ID is not science.
$Fail^2$

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 26 Feb 2022 09:22:51 No.14264295 Report

Quoted By:

>>14252333
great teeth on these guys
dentistry would die out if we just stopped consuming sugar and simple carbs.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 26 Feb 2022 09:41:21 No.14264318 Report

Quoted By:

>>14263665
>i guess the intelligent designer was too retarded to disable radiation, entropy and make transcription more accurate
Free will. If you can't change your biology in accordance with your will, your will isn't sufficiently free.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 26 Feb 2022 09:47:33 No.14264328 Report

Quoted By: >>14264380

>>14243774
This, in the natural state men are the decorative gender. Larger bodies, bigger eyelashes etc. Women mimick it with makeup though

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 26 Feb 2022 09:54:35 No.14264336 Report

Quoted By:

>>14243764
Men are bigger, hairier, greater, riskier, and far more agressice then women im general. On a behavior standpoint human males are like male birdsz vyimg for.the most hypergamous female. The bright feather or fur shit is specific to birds and some primates. Remember we have beards, mustaches, chest hair, back bair, male pattern baldness even etc...
In caveman times that provides a very wide canvas for grooming art with hair.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 26 Feb 2022 09:57:06 No.14264337 Report

Quoted By:

>>14243788
Women have huge tits, ass, wideer hips, long hair. I agree very aesthetic. Attractive ones have clearer skin too

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 26 Feb 2022 10:00:59 No.14264338 Report

Quoted By:

>>14262803
Kek based

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 149592556_733166590670164_176692 (...).jpg, 124KiB, 1080x1291

Anonymous Sat 26 Feb 2022 10:41:55 No.14264380 Report

Quoted By:

>>14264328
>the natural state men are the decorative gender. Larger bodies, bigger eyelashes
I've heard this, women saying men don't realize the naturally long eyelashes men have and how they have to use makeup to get that same effect. It's true though since I have long eyelashes, full lips, women have commented to me about my well-defined attractive brows but unfortunately modern society thinks being attractive means you are more feminine and that real men are supposed to look like ogres. That you have to be ugly or you are not masculine.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Feb 2022 04:16:24 No.14266322 Report

Quoted By:

>>14264290
>Because you're an absolute failure. You can't prove your ridiculous claim.
Your seething is adorable. Delicious. I easily proved my claims and they remain proven. Keep crying about it and making up seeth posts that attack me instead of attacking my arguments. Every time you keep doing it it's stronger proof you are defeated.
>So you resort to moving goalposts and ad hominems
Why do you lie so openly? What I said encompassed lesser components and I proved this with my political party example. I did not move goalposts whatsoever, liar.
I called you a midwit bc you asked a midwit question. 4/5 people in this thread started the ad-hominemns against me. Does that mean they are failures who can't prove their claims? I'll await your hypocritical answer stating it's somehow different when they do it.
>Nobody cares if you list 2 or more components
Then why the hell was it asked???
>You even failed to grasp that the point was about ID, not the number of components could or should have
No, I pointed out that I knew there was an ulterior motive due to the smartass nature of asking such a midwit question so I just said look it up on google. I'm much smarter than you, I understand the meta behind what people are saying/asking quite easily.
>This is a science board. ID is not science.
Adorable cope. Once again, just because you don't understand something does not mean it's not true.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Feb 2022 05:50:38 No.14266477 Report

Quoted By:

>>14252333
2 or 4

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1627058017695.png, 128KiB, 866x752

Anonymous Sun 27 Feb 2022 11:26:52 No.14266756 Report

Quoted By: >>14266761

>>14262803
Cope moid

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Feb 2022 11:29:25 No.14266761 Report

Quoted By:

>>14266756
>desperate CC hole craves my dick

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches