>>14245221>What is this, a job to you?It's an argument. Ever heard of burden of proof? It's very common for you conspiracy theorists to attempt to shift it once you realize your bullshit has no basis.
>I'm making you look at yourself and see your own tendency towards confirmation biasDelusional. The only one exhibiting bias is yourself, since you would rather focus on a nonsensical conspiracy theory that no doubt aligns with your politics rather than seeing the obvious one right in front of your face.
>I bet you still haven't even tried to find a wealthy person lobbying for carbon taxesIt's not even relevant, as I already explained. Keep trying to shift the burden of proof and deflect, it's entertaining.
>It seems to me that logically one of>wealthy people have lobbied for carbon taxes>nobody has lobbied for carbon taxes>some people have lobbied for carbon taxes but none were wealthy>must be trueAnd what did I say that implied these are all false?
