/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #14242110

97KiB, 498x498, peepo-nervous.gif

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 08:52:05 2022 No.14242110 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>14242115 >>14242146

Hey /sci/, newfag here. If we can bombard Uranium with stuff and turn it into Plutonium, why can't we turn Platinum into Gold using the same process?

Pls respond

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 08:57:57 No.14242115 Report

Quoted By: >>14242124

>>14242110
We can. But it would take insane ammounts of money and effort and we don't really need gold.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 09:01:46 No.14242124 Report

Quoted By: >>14242137 >>14242151 >>14242223

>>14242115
For real? So we have actually unlocked alchemism?

frogblogger

frogblogger Fri 18 Feb 2022 09:05:32 No.14242133 Report

Quoted By: >>14242142

Might be possible, however...
>it would be extremely expensive
>it would probably make highly radioactive gold
But we should try to do such nuclear tricks more. The lack of nuclear research is sad.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 09:06:24 No.14242136 Report

Quoted By:

>newfag here
There's a tranny who might get mad at you for posting frogs, so be aware of that

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 09:07:12 No.14242137 Report

Quoted By:

>>14242124
Well it's nuclear physics, but yes. We can do fusion and fission. It just has a really high energy cost and a lot of expensive machinery is needed.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 09:08:20 No.14242142 Report

Quoted By:

>>14242133
>The lack of nuclear research is sad.
I agree completely.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 09:10:07 No.14242146 Report

Quoted By:

>>14242110
If you are really interested, look up how to build fusors at home. there is some hobby level but pretty cool shit you can build.

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO images - 2022-01-14T171505.142.jpg, 36KiB, 620x494

OP Fri 18 Feb 2022 09:11:08 No.14242150 Report

Quoted By:

Wow, this is actually pretty crazy, I though the only way to make elements was with large colliders that create a miniscule amount, I never imagined we could make tons of radioactive gold like we do with weapons grade plutonium

Thanks /sci/

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1563431862081.png, 13KiB, 454x520

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 09:11:31 No.14242151 Report

Quoted By: >>14242154 >>14242253

>>14242124

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO images (42).png, 30KiB, 691x444

OP Fri 18 Feb 2022 09:13:33 No.14242154 Report

Quoted By: >>14242253

>>14242151
I HEKIN love science now!!!1

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 09:57:51 No.14242223 Report

Quoted By:

>>14242124
Yes, except for the fact that it costs more in energy than you get out in value and the result is radioactive

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 10:12:01 No.14242253 Report

Quoted By: >>14242337

>>14242151
>>14242154
>science board hating on alchemy
not that anon but this is just sad
you know, newton liked alchemy.
he was a little bit smater than you

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 10:14:01 No.14242257 Report

Quoted By:

i need, like, ...
450KG of gold

pls desu ?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 10:24:15 No.14242276 Report

Quoted By:

zim zam billabium!

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Feb 2022 10:53:32 No.14242337 Report

Quoted By:

>>14242253
They aren't hating on alchemy, they hate anyone who is not a scinetist but finds science interesting; they associate that with the "i love science", big bang theory watching peoploe misinformed by science communicators.
I honestly find both the "i love science" people and the bitter cynical people equally anoying.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches