>>14238647The idea is cool but the statement is stupid.
First of all we don't know the behavior of each girl.
As
>>14238758 points out we don't know how the get information and how they react to it.
>>14238760Since we don't know how the random numbers are generated we can assume that if you were one girl there's 50% chance the other girl has a lower number in which case following this strategy will make you lose. There's also 50% chance the other girl has a higher chance, in which case the other girl can "make a coin flip" after some turns and try to guess if they have the lower or bigger number.
We need more information regarding the distribution (and bound probably) of the numbers and the other in which girls hear each other and maybe then we can analyze the probabilities and figure stuff from there.
