>>14222422It's just logic, men are disposable women aren't, no point letting a woman die and taking her procreation capabilities with her when you can get a man doing the same task without the loss. One man can get 50 women pregnant and it makes 50 babies, one woman can have sex with 50 men and only produce one child.
If it isn't the case men are pretty much doing all the risky work then it's normally due to the environment being so shit the women were forced to get involved as well (think how managers don't get involved in employees work unless shit hits the fan). I probably shouldn't even bother with this post since it's almost bait given how it works off the feminist logic that "no no no, everything was equal until it wasn't" (hyperbole ofc but you get the idea).
>>14223015Not the OP but that seems more likely an exception that proves the rule. I know it's not you personally stating it but I've seen that story before and it's always treated as a "girl boss"-esque anti-patriarchy claim.
The problem is that it's just one example against tens of thousands of counter examples (men dominated groups), and realistically is probably just a fluke due to some specific causes that caught on (ofc the same people who use it as a political piece would refuse to admit it's more likely that).
