It's been awhile, but back before COVID, the other thing sci used to discuss was radio technology and other electronics that rely on EM radiation outside of the visible spectrum.
The general consensus amongst the IFLS types and the pro-censorship redditors on this board, is that all forms of radio and cell technology are perfectly safe, that this is "settled science", and that anyone who is concerned about cell phones or communication towers or 5G or anything like that is just a far-right conspiracy theorist who should be censored. But if that's the case, then why are government organizations and an entire global community of hundreds of scientists actively researching the safety of radio and cell technology, and the environmental and public healthy consequences of EM radiation? In what sense is the science settled? I'm not even someone who's very concerned about stuff like 5G or anything. Like if I found out tomorrow that 5G is carcinogenic, it would have no impact on my behavior or lifestyle. Nevertheless, I think it's a perfectly legitimate and interesting and valuable scientific question to ask whether 5G has any negative health effects, and intuitively I would not be surprised if, e.g. it was found to be carcinogenic.
I just don't get how all the scientifically illiterate normies on this board feel so confident in shitting on everyone else, and constantly labeling anyone who disagrees with them as a conspiracy theorist whether in be in the context of 5G or vaccines. I mean, there is literally an entire subject called RADIOBIOLOGY devoted to the study of how EM radiation impacts living organisms and systems, so the idea that a new EM technology like 5G could be hazardous is not some crazy conspiracy theory. Again, this is not an important issue to me, and I don't have a serious concerns about 5G, but all I'm saying is that is could have health consequences that we're not aware off, and that's not an outlandish "conspiracy theory".
The general consensus amongst the IFLS types and the pro-censorship redditors on this board, is that all forms of radio and cell technology are perfectly safe, that this is "settled science", and that anyone who is concerned about cell phones or communication towers or 5G or anything like that is just a far-right conspiracy theorist who should be censored. But if that's the case, then why are government organizations and an entire global community of hundreds of scientists actively researching the safety of radio and cell technology, and the environmental and public healthy consequences of EM radiation? In what sense is the science settled? I'm not even someone who's very concerned about stuff like 5G or anything. Like if I found out tomorrow that 5G is carcinogenic, it would have no impact on my behavior or lifestyle. Nevertheless, I think it's a perfectly legitimate and interesting and valuable scientific question to ask whether 5G has any negative health effects, and intuitively I would not be surprised if, e.g. it was found to be carcinogenic.
I just don't get how all the scientifically illiterate normies on this board feel so confident in shitting on everyone else, and constantly labeling anyone who disagrees with them as a conspiracy theorist whether in be in the context of 5G or vaccines. I mean, there is literally an entire subject called RADIOBIOLOGY devoted to the study of how EM radiation impacts living organisms and systems, so the idea that a new EM technology like 5G could be hazardous is not some crazy conspiracy theory. Again, this is not an important issue to me, and I don't have a serious concerns about 5G, but all I'm saying is that is could have health consequences that we're not aware off, and that's not an outlandish "conspiracy theory".
