>>14206104Those "mentally ill muppets" spent the better part of a decade analyzing the physical evidence of the attacks and developing a detailed minute-by-minute explanation of everything that happened. The NIST final report on the collapse of Building 7 is 100+ pages long and is the culmination of tens of thousands of manhours and hundreds of thousands of hours of computing time.
I guarantee you've never read it, never skimmed through it, never looked at how much work they put into testing whether explosives could have been used in the collapse, never read into how much effort went into analyzing and simulating the spread of the fires, the thermal expansion and weakening of the support structure, the probable break points, you've never looked at how their simulation data was able to correctly predict the premature collapse of the penthouse levels (something the controlled demolition theory hasn't come up with an explanation for in 20 years), etc.
Nope, anything that disagrees with your preconceptions is just rejected outright. "Scholars for 9/11 Truth" used to have a fucking Cambridge physicist on their team for years during the initial investigations. But the second he found that the evidence supported the official narrative that a plane hit the Pentagon and suggested that the community should revisit their other hypotheses, he was kicked out of the organization and branded a 'traitor'. After all, who needs scientific rigor when you can just make wild accusations and accuse everyone who disagrees with you of being a government agent?
If you make a claim, the burden of proof is on you to find evidence to support it, not on everyone else to do your job for you.
