>>14200004"Time dilation", is simply a description. A measure of the change in "time"(the measure) between two clocks. Saying this is a cause or "caused" something is a non-sequitur. The actual modality that caused the change between the clocks remains unexplained, but some go so far as to be foolish imply time itself caused it. As if time actually existed and caused anything and not simply a measurement.
I was referring to relativity. Why would you disprove what was never proven? All you would do is feed it more attention by implying it is right which is why it needs to be "disproved". That's not how it works. You don't feed the trolls, even if they don't know they're trolls.
>>14200052>Nathan got his bachelors in physics from OSU I don't give a shit about "Nathan" or his book learned moron certificate, thanks for adding that for no reason whatsoever though. Gasp! He got low (QUANTIFIED ACEDEMIC GOOD BOY POINTS) that sure makes me think less of him.
>Just so you know the kind of retard you're agreeing with.>agreeing We're not agreeing though. I'm more or less calling him a retard for wasting the time "disproving" a theory that had no basis in reality to begin with. Don't you have better things to do Nathan?
