>>14182495Even if evolutionism is a lie, why would that make creationism a truth?
>their starting position is a rejection of anything supernaturalYeah, you can't work with the supernatural to explain natural phenomena. That's the lazy way out.
>How would the interior remain so similar if the exterior can change so much? Are you seriously asking why exteriors change and interiors don't? You ever saw two people wearing different clothes or is that simply unfathomable to you?
>humans being close to fish and bananasYeah that's absolute retardation, I agree. We're both carbon based lifeforms but it stops there.
>natural selection is select animals dying out and evolutionism claims transformations into new kinds occurOh okay guess I am against evolutionism as well. New features do come out of natural selection though, look into genetic algorithms to have a live demonstration on how you can solve basic algorithmic problems with just randomness and environmental pressure if it is that hard for you to grasp. It's extremely egocentric to think patterns can only come out of human intelligence.
>The evolutionists also refuse to deal with origin of life because they have no real answer,That's honestly a shame, but there ain't shit we can do right now.
If I hear a loud bang outside of my place and then hear tires screeching but I'm not able to see what happened, I might theorize some crime just took place. I could also go the lazy way and say "a ghost is making loud noises in the neighborhood".
Even if what happened in the end was that a car had a very damaged muffled and screechy tires, and we were both wrong, why the hell would be recurring to the lazy ghost theory acceptable at all?
It might be very hard to prove what actually happened but you just don't fucking give up by saying lol ghosts. Come on.
