>>14177519>They cannot comment on policy at allNo one said anything about doctors helping form policy, that's irrelevant. Of course they can't, not in our current government structure. That's not the point however. If you don't think the bureaucracy implemented the medical community's exact guidance in their of course of action in handling a destabilizing global bio threat, then you literally believe the government is a circus, which i know they are bad, but not that bad.
>In fact the majority of virologists I know are well aware vaccine mandates are likely not a good callThat is also a lie. The virologists/medical community are the ones who pushed forward the notion and strongly advised for it, also a mandate has nothing to do with virology, so that point is moot. Why would the government implement a deeply polarizing unpreferable policy that will help disintegrate your economy for the favor of a measly few pharmaceutical giants? Why would they bet and potentially tank every other industry of financial resource for the sake of a potentially temporary threat, also from an economic standpoint its an absolutely horrific idea. So this must clearly be urgent advice from experts, because then our government is literally brain dead if it wasn't.
>This "right" of a business to refuse to employ someone who did not have a medical procedure done was unheard of.I don't know where you live but that is trivial right now, that's not illegal, individuals pose a threat to other individuals, its protection policy, completely legal. This is a state of emergency, equivalent to national security threat (actually global). This not a regular period of function for constitution. During states of emergency, rights are always forfeited for the sake of handling intense disaster, especially when you are in the thick of it.
pt. 1
