>>14175222>WrongOkay, well that really depends on what your viewpoint of gravity is then. You have 3 popular choices to choose from:
Gravity: The description of mass accelerating to mass ("mass accelerates to mass", how: unknown)
Gravity: The geomancy of euclidean geometry and time itself (somehow)
Gravity: The "force" of attraction between mass. (which because it's unexplained reverts back to a simple description and not actually a "force" proven).
>stupidLol, as if anyone here actually knows how magnets work.
>missing the pointWhat is your point exactly? That a field is "doing work"? A field is only definable when it does something in the first place. It IS the work, not "it does the work".
What if your paperclip was plastic? Glass? Actual paper? What would it do then? It would do fuck all. If it were made of aluminum it would actually repel away from it. So in my opinion it's the paperclip actually doing the work, a magnet I can't really change because most are made of the same thing and do the same thing. If I were to break it down even further, one might say that every single element has these "magnetic fields" that some ignorantly attribute to "magnets" only.
