>>14173773the zero we use is poorly defined, since its reciprocal is undefined.
Define the 0 we know as a member of the set containing all multiples of zero, where the "zero set" and is the "unit zero" that defines the set
While the exact value of just "0/0" is unknown, we know that since each zero is a well-defined element within the zero set, its value is well-defined. Therefore, sorcery like this
>>14014094 becomes impossible.
for example, , leaving no room for interpretation