>>14173158this sounds eerily familiar. Where have I heard this before .....
Oh yah I remember my fuhrer!
It is self-evident that where this democracy rules, the people as such are not taken into consideration at all. The only thing that matters is the existence of a few hundred gigantic capitalists who own all the factories and their stock and, through them, control the people. The masses of the people do not interest them in the least. They are interested in them just as were our bourgeois parties in former times – only when elections are being held, when they need votes. Otherwise, the life of the masses is a matter of complete indifference to them.
To this must be added the difference in education. Is it not ludicrous to hear a member of the British Labor Party – who, of course, as a member of the Opposition is officially paid by the government – say: ‘When the war is over, we will do something in social respects’?
Yes, Germany was back then a democracy, before us, and we’ve been plundered squeezed and dried, No! What does democracy or authoritarian state mean for those International hyenas? They don’t care at all! They are only Interested In one thing. Are you willing to be plundered? Yes or No? Are you stupid enough to keep quiet In the process? Yes or No? And when a democracy is stupid enough not to stand up, then it is good? But when an authoritarian state declares, you do not plunder our people any longer, neither from the inside or outside! Then that Is bad?
In reality money rules in these countries. They talk about press freedom, when in fact all these newspapers have one owner, and the owner is in any case the sponsor, this press then shapes public opinion. These political parties don’t have any differences at all, like before with us, you already know the old political parties, they were all the same.