>>14169787>Would we recognise the studies that were done in support of lobotomy as being valid and following the scientific method?For every scientist who makes the claim A there is a scientist who makes the claim not A. And another scientist who makes the claim B. They each have their peer reviewed study to back their claims.
Science is a process, carried by a debate. It never settles. No objective truth exists.
After 250 years of trying to define causality, the underlying principle of the inductive scientific method, we are further away from a consensus then ever before.
