>>14168117>[[[rationalwiki]]]the website seems to be written in a very inflamatory manner. like a redditor, but who's spent at least a few days in an actual academic building. it seems like a reaction to conservapedia and the like*, which in turn, was a reaction to political bias on wikipedia**.
in essence, it's ramblings of an autist who thinks his opinion is more important than others think it is. like snopes, but packaged differently
i'm surprised it's still going. less surprised it gets regularly pushed on finnish mushroom-picking blog.
*forgot the other ones, there were at least 3, but conservapedia is the only one i remember.
**back when wikipedia was starting with it's political bias and when it started purging articles (creationism and global warming were the main ones).
