/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #14166168

>>14166244
Yes clearly. The fact that we’ve created different categorizations is proof of that. A lot of the differences may be superficial, but they are still real.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 30 Jan 2022 14:41:31 No.14166663 Report

Quoted By:

>>14166168
As close as every other human on earth

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 30 Jan 2022 15:05:31 No.14166699 Report

Quoted By:

>>14166240
I ARRAIA DO G.A.S.A

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1613954502082.jpg, 421KiB, 1200x1080

Anonymous Sun 30 Jan 2022 18:15:26 No.14167206 Report

Quoted By:

>>14166168
>How close are aboriginals and bushmen to chimpanzees and bonobos genetically speaking?
Ever so slightly farther removed than white people.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 30 Jan 2022 23:53:51 No.14168509 Report

Quoted By: >>14168538

>>14166168
They're anatomically modern humans, and are actually smarter than the first ones discovered. Amh have been around for 300k years.

Chimp subspecies divered 1-2 million years ago. Likewise for gorilla and orange subspecies.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Jan 2022 00:03:55 No.14168538 Report

Quoted By:

>>14168509
Asian and native Americans diverged 20kya
Asians and Eurasia 45kya
Eurasia and Africans 60kya
Australoid from Africans 70kya
Neanderthal 800kya
Chimp 6mya
Gorilla 8mya
Orangutan 14 kya
Gibbons 18kya

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Jan 2022 00:07:01 No.14168552 Report

Quoted By:

>>14166215
Pigs have 38 DNA molecules, 5.4 billion bp. We have 46 DNA molecules, 6 billion bp.
This claim is slightly more believable than the one with bananas.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO papuaNG.jpg, 343KiB, 1600x900

Anonymous Mon 31 Jan 2022 00:26:37 No.14168621 Report

Quoted By: >>14168647

Depends. abbos carry dna from neanderthals and two separate groups of denisovans. We now know that archaic human species were basically homo erectus who came out of Africa much much earlier and continued evolving convergently into an approximately human species. Thing is though neanderthals/denisovans still carried even older archaic hominid DNA, so yes they would be more closely related to chimps than anatomically modern humans, the most distinguishing part of modern humans is their divergence from other apes. Pic related is from papua new guinea, still related to abbos.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Jan 2022 00:35:19 No.14168647 Report

Quoted By: >>14168653 >>14168680

>>14168621
Wow that person in the front left actually looks like a different species to me. Like my brain doesn't register them as a the same.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO naledi.jpg, 124KiB, 800x480

Anonymous Mon 31 Jan 2022 00:37:19 No.14168653 Report

Quoted By: >>14168680

>>14168647
See the resemblance?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO neanderthal.jpg, 68KiB, 640x427

Anonymous Mon 31 Jan 2022 00:43:51 No.14168680 Report

Quoted By:

>>14168647
>>14168653
Then finally neanderthals. Imagine if you just inverted the nose shape and reversed the prognathism, then lightened the skin.

Neanderthals were basically just dolichocephalic naledis.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Jan 2022 04:14:59 No.14169298 Report

Quoted By:

>>14166658
a lot, but not all. lets talk about the non-superficial differences

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Jan 2022 04:18:03 No.14169309 Report

Quoted By:

>>14166244
Not in the same way dogs are. More like landraces.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches