>Is there a proven, scientific connection between Japanese child porn comics and actual crimes committed against real children?There's a link between possession of such images and crimes against children, but not against the proliferation of such images actually resulting in crimes against children.
The morality brigade has it entirely wrong and the issue is that these cartoons cause people to abstain from sexual interaction altogether. The psychological reason for these campaigns is that people want to blame child rape on Japanese cartoons instead of biology, which is why people involved in such campaigns were frequently diddled as children or diddlers themselves as such people don't really want to admit that diddling is just what humans do. Because of the correlation mentioned at the top, it's easy for them to delude themselves by focusing on that correlation and ignoring contradictory evidence.
>>14164401A fascinating theory that falls apart on the grounds that you believe that becoming a marval loving basedboy will lead to you leaving your house and trying to re-enact what you saw in your chinese cartoons. It doesn't matter if these chinese cartoons delude basedboys if the net effect of them is to cause them to live in their mother's basement trading crypto and living off of grubhub.
most diddling happens within a family and people who engage in these family simply aren't in a position where they take care of children on any sort of regular basis.
>>14165432I'm amazed how hardcore the whole pedo/homo overlap got memory holed. Homos have loved fucking young boys since antiquity. Now there's a whole fucking set of mental gymnastics about how REAL homos don't actually want to fuck strapping arrogant cocky young beautiful boipossy.
