>>14165175>>All that quantum fluctuation in a vacuum has nothing to do with the properties I provided>It has nothing to do with anything because it's made up bullshit with no basis in reality. There is no vacuum in nature, go find one and then promptly negate your findings by being in "it"...negating the fucking "vacuum" you retard.when people say vacuum they mean the vacuum of space.
that vacuum is teaming with quantum-foam..
this is nevertheless what is referred to by the term vacuum.
no, there is no such thing as an ideal-vacuum.
did you just discover this?
does switching to this argument mean something?
electromagnetism can propagate thru both a vacuum and an ideal vacuum.
everyone already knows this, you switching topics to this is you attempting to dodge the bullet.
>>electromagnetism and electrostatic fields don't need a medium to propagate.>They are "the medium" you fucking moron.empty space is not considered a medium.
>>your post is gibberish.>You're literally saying "something is in nothing". It's a non-sequitur, now go unfuck yourself because this is the last (you) you get.No, the nothing that tards like you refer to is space vacuum.
thats why you think quantum fluctuation is all you need for big bang..
nothing by a true definition is "not existing"..
such a thing does not exist in this universe.
