This ties in to the DoE/ORNL/SLAC story as well…
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/01/220128100759.htm
They have essentially inverted certain aspects of what I’ve written, although, the inverse ought to be true. Whereas I’ve written that we could create phonons using electrons flowing through a superconductor, in this article, Mr. Wang has used a supercomputer to prove that phonons can improve superconduction. One proves the other.
I still believe that the best approach for creating functional room-temperature superconductors is going to be exerting intense pressure/torque between coiled layers of a hexagonally structured material in order to maintain charge density waves. Fundamentally, when temperature drops to near absolute-zero, axis spin is being halted, and thus, so is magnetic moment, to which electrons are responsive. Alternating moment would result in ordinary conditions of conduction, with the interactions between electrons in the conductive material and the electrons flowing in the wire interacting in such a way that some of the electrical energy is converted into magnetic energy.
The other condition under which electrons can form Cooper Pairs, even without low temperatures, would be for the electrons forming the wall of the superconductor to alternate (spin on their own axis) but to do so in a way that North and South never point toward the electrons being conducted. East or West would always be the side of those electrons facing inwards, so their energy would be focused outward and would not interfere with conduction.
I am once again vindicated and have not been contacted by anyone at DoE, ORNL, or the University of Texas at Austin. I think we need to be concerned that this sudden advancement in energy physics was the result of yet another plagiarization of my work.
Check it out and decide for yourself.
The technique I've described could be used to both heat and cool thermally reactive strands depending upon calibration.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/01/220128100759.htm
They have essentially inverted certain aspects of what I’ve written, although, the inverse ought to be true. Whereas I’ve written that we could create phonons using electrons flowing through a superconductor, in this article, Mr. Wang has used a supercomputer to prove that phonons can improve superconduction. One proves the other.
I still believe that the best approach for creating functional room-temperature superconductors is going to be exerting intense pressure/torque between coiled layers of a hexagonally structured material in order to maintain charge density waves. Fundamentally, when temperature drops to near absolute-zero, axis spin is being halted, and thus, so is magnetic moment, to which electrons are responsive. Alternating moment would result in ordinary conditions of conduction, with the interactions between electrons in the conductive material and the electrons flowing in the wire interacting in such a way that some of the electrical energy is converted into magnetic energy.
The other condition under which electrons can form Cooper Pairs, even without low temperatures, would be for the electrons forming the wall of the superconductor to alternate (spin on their own axis) but to do so in a way that North and South never point toward the electrons being conducted. East or West would always be the side of those electrons facing inwards, so their energy would be focused outward and would not interfere with conduction.
I am once again vindicated and have not been contacted by anyone at DoE, ORNL, or the University of Texas at Austin. I think we need to be concerned that this sudden advancement in energy physics was the result of yet another plagiarization of my work.
Check it out and decide for yourself.
The technique I've described could be used to both heat and cool thermally reactive strands depending upon calibration.
