>>14160404What qualifies as the fittest in the term "survival of the fittest" is entirely dependent on the environment. A shark / dolphin / whatever might be the apex predator but it's won't be if you stick it in the middle of the Sahara. Trophy hunting has shown us that being the king of the jungle doesn't count for shit if you get plinked from a mile out by some out of shape faggot with a scoped rifle.
>"Well why don't we just evolve into the apex predator that can do all that and more?"Evolution as a process will do the bare minimum to make an organism fit for its environment. Fitness is more a measure of efficiency than superiority. Look at a lion / hawk on one of those nature programs and you'll see that it spends a lot of time doing nothing between its hunts. I'm honestly not surprised that a namefag calling himself Ozymandias hasn't put a lot of thought into his question.
