/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #14157376

407KiB, 535x480, 1642796257975.gif

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 03:24:24 2022 No.14157376 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>14157380 >>14157384 >>14157386 >>14157739 >>14157751 >>14158303 >>14160030 >>14160114 >>14160149 >>14160205 >>14160391

What are some mathematical paradoxes for mee to ponder?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 2022 03:25:29 No.14157380 Report

Quoted By: >>14157382

>>14157376
How can 13% equal 52%?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 2022 03:26:38 No.14157382 Report

Quoted By:

>>14157380
If u iz a nigga.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 2022 03:27:04 No.14157384 Report

Quoted By: >>14157390

>>14157376
If you are so smart why don’t you have a girlfriend?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 2022 03:28:06 No.14157386 Report

Quoted By: >>14157729

>>14157376
What dies early but also die late?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO chads.gif, 1MiB, 800x600

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 2022 03:30:13 No.14157390 Report

Quoted By: >>14160013

>>14157384
I feel sorry for you if you think "smart" attracts women.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 2022 06:06:36 No.14157729 Report

Quoted By:

>>14157386
Good one

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 2022 06:09:34 No.14157739 Report

Quoted By:

>>14157376
$\displaystyle<br />(-8)^{6/3) \neq (-8)^2<br />$

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 2022 06:14:13 No.14157751 Report

Quoted By: >>14157870

>>14157376
$\displaystyle <br />(-8)^{ \frac{6}{2}} \neq (-8)^3<br />$

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 2022 06:58:52 No.14157870 Report

Quoted By: >>14159741

>>14157751
Explain.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 2022 11:28:39 No.14158303 Report

Quoted By:

>>14157376
Normal numbers: almost every number is normal, but you can’t write or compute one

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 2022 19:48:55 No.14159741 Report

Quoted By:

>>14157870
He's making shit up

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 2022 19:57:11 No.14159792 Report

Quoted By:

9 both is and is not contagious.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 2022 20:26:39 No.14159923 Report

Quoted By: >>14160017

How can it make sense about definite completed infinite processes when we can ever only compute finite things.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 2022 20:52:06 No.14160013 Report

Quoted By:

>>14157390
they really got everything in this meme.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 2022 20:52:34 No.14160017 Report

Quoted By:

>>14159923
You can use it to prove that there can't be a completed infinite list of completed infinite lists.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 2022 20:57:20 No.14160030 Report

Quoted By: >>14160120 >>14160192

>>14157376
There exists a construct-able infinite set that is a subset of a finite set.
See Andrej Bauer 2017 paper on the 5 stages of accepting constructive mathematics.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 2022 21:25:06 No.14160114 Report

Quoted By:

>>14157376
0 is prime yet it is divisible by every number

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 2022 21:26:12 No.14160120 Report

Quoted By: >>14160128 >>14160178 >>14160381

>>14160030
Not finite != infinite.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 2022 21:28:04 No.14160128 Report

Quoted By: >>14160178

>>14160120
underrated (if you've read the paper)

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 2022 21:33:11 No.14160149 Report

Quoted By: >>14160196

>>14157376
there's banach tarski
more than just "ooh ahh two spheres" but why should people accept the axiom of choice. what kinds of sets could you think up where it's difficult to find even one element of it?

Also in the moving checker pieces five rows up using infinite pieces uses a "backwards woosh" which is an infinite series that instead of having no end (like the largest natural number) has no beginning. here
https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/solarmy/

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 2022 21:40:55 No.14160178 Report

Quoted By: >>14160192

>>14160120
>>14160128
What paper?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO S0273-0979-2016-01556-4.pdf, 367KiB, 1x1

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 2022 21:43:46 No.14160192 Report

Quoted By:

>>14160178
The one this poster >>14160030 cited, here

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO proof.png, 103KiB, 1322x761

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 2022 21:44:05 No.14160196 Report

Quoted By:

>>14160149
>axiom of choice
i suspect the axiom of choice is bullshit because of the limitations of turing machines. i bet most sets have elements so nasty and innumerable that no algorithm exists to make the choices.

i haven't thought about it more, though, since in most cases of interest this isn't a problem. but mathematically it feels like a huge *and then a miracle happens* step

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 2022 21:48:51 No.14160205 Report

Quoted By:

>>14157376
don't ponder any cloud problems.
ponder on the real ones:
1) how is electron rotates around positron and not flying away?
2) how is so called "space vacuum" exist and doesn't suck everything off any planet?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 2022 22:21:25 No.14160381 Report

Quoted By:

>>14160120
Ah yes good point

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Jan 2022 22:23:58 No.14160391 Report

Quoted By:

>>14157376
How much of a fag u r.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches