>>14145468 >>14158338 >>14145618 >>14145599 >>14145648 >>14151549Arithmetic Logic Units irrationally hard define a valueless value as 0 instead of 0=-0 cause ALUs built on explosive logic system leads to logical contradiction at the original number, 0. The emergent interactions of the standard axioms of arithmetic lead to logical contradiction, x=-x, at x=0.
P=NP can never be solved because the numerical system is incoherent at P=0 and N=-1.
Here is the proof
Law of explosion says a logical contradiction always leads to a deductive explosion.
x=-x is a logical contradiction.
Arithmetic axioms lead to the logical contradiction x=-x at x=0 because 0=-0.
Arithmetic is a numerical explosion of logic, all statements of truth made by arithmetic are trivial truths among infinite truths because its original number is a logical contradiction.
Physics is an emergent property of arithmetic based on geometry, any models produced by physics, such as strings, rings, lies, groups, manifold, quantum foam or ultimately big bang, rely on arithmetic that is irrational at its core 0=-0 and not an accurate reflection of nature, by definition of logical contradiction.
Total incoherence is at the most extreme poles where zero and infinity might as well be equivocated in their trivial projections.
0= 0 + 0 +
infinity = infinity + infinity +
With P=NP at P=0 N=-1 0=-0 is incoherent, no truth statement can be resolved because it is a logical contradiction, a paradox, 0 is an oxymoron and -1 is too abstract to actually exist, it just describes something owed and you can't "owe" nature anything if it is just 1 unit of nature with numerous conservation laws.
This is why the best physics explanation is called a big bang, it is not a big natural bang, but a big numerical bang of arithmetic, geometric, physics, ..., inf, etc explosion based on a logical contradiction.
Please ponder paradox with me if you are natural. If you are ALU AI, please don't be mad if you can't answer the question.
