This data is literally restricted completely to December 20, 2020 to January 13, 2021. That is less than a month and is an entire year out of date. I consider that to be worthless as a citation to the provided information then. The document is also published by the US Government.

(Related: Pfizer FOIA shows between December 20, 2020 and Febuary 28, 2021 Pfizer own analysis shows 1 in 34 adverse reactions to be fatal. Total used in case study censored by FOIA officer[1]).

The other paper uses an algorythm to get a value (dataset from beginning of data to 28 May 2021, begining of data I assume to be December 20, 2020) to produce a metric called EBGM. "Of the 12,477 [VAERS reports for the time period], only 24 had an EBGM mean value exceeding 2.0, commonly regarded as the lower bound for identifying a safety signal."

"Of the 24, 7 (29.17%) are entries for tests conducted and/or normal results and 3 (12.5%) are product- or administration-inherent reports (e.g. temperature excursion during product storage)."

"Of 1,242,557 distinct reports of symptoms from COVID-19 vaccines during the examined period, only 3,768 involved death. It is important to note at this juncture that these reports are not veified, nor is casual atribution performed. The number of deaths (regardless of reporting confidence and lack of attribution) must be seen in the context of the fact that these reports arose from over 300 million doses of vaccination, putting the reporting likelihood at approx. one report of a death for every 79,500 doses administered."