>>14140367>take the image that you just posted, that is the implementation of an already existing meme in a novel way, is it suddenly "low IQ" since the framework for the meme has already been established?I made it and the answer to this question is yes.
>greentext a reply to write three paragraphs in response but don’t quote the post>take it personally when anon shits on /pol/ and respond with thinly veiled condescension and ad hom>use polysyllabic words to sound smart but say nothing of substance>reddit spacingyou’re a massive faggot, you are cancer, kill yourself.
>>14140958wrong. comedy is nihilistically destructive. scientific practice is purposefully destructive. that’s why anti-vaxxers are fucking clowns. there are reasonable questions one could ask about vaccines, but they attack the entire practice without providing an alternative i.e.
>I don’t wanna take the vaccine!>immunocompromised people? not my problem/muh natural selectioncomedy is for people who want the notoriety of discovery without one shred of personal sacrifice
