>>14106187No, since no scientists (or at least a very small portion of them) think tautologies are derived from experience. Most just say tautologies are not "informative", defining "informative" to be a property applying to any empirical proposition. The problem here is is they then equivocate their notion of informativity with a layman usage of informativity to derive that tautologies are not useful. This is obviously false, since then all of mathematics would be useless.
