>>14101954>not knownAhh... Thanks for mentioning that.
My confusion is related to how literally curvature is usually understood. I always had this vague feeling that there is some kind of duality to the interior region that I couldn't wrap my head around. I just realized that this is because for both the outside and infilling observer the nature of the interior region must be very, wildly different. After all for each the way their degrees of freedom map differently to space and time and both maps must be equally valid.
I still don't really grasp it, but I think what I am saying is that from the outside pov the interior region could be a white hole into an inaccessible region? The illustration hopefully explains what I mean. I was being retarded and you need 1+1D to see what mean. For someone falling in well becomes time, but from the outside it's still time. But it's not really reachable because you can't arbitrarily flip time with a space coordinate. That would be, uh, equivalent to FTL? But if you somehow happened to be created there flipped? Or ejected. Not sure, really just started to get what's been bugging mekso long. To be fair, what you wrote might have inspired me a bit, although the region isn't inaccessible because it's bubbled off, but because it's rotated wrt t.
In any case, I'm 100% convinced the blue stuff must be some real, physical, non degenerate spacetime the same way the regions outside our past/future light cone are real, if inaccessible. But light from there can eventually reach us so we know it's real.
>Personally, I don't believe any black hole is a true singularity.Me neither, it's just a very deep well. We know BHs evaporate. We can calculate when. Thus we have all the variables to solve for the curvature. Not sure if that is actually true mathematically (psobably?), but you get the idea. It seems like it should be obviously true that curvature would equal the depth of the well, which is equal to the remaining BH lifetime. Like picrel.
