>>14092948>its that simpleNo it's not. An untouched niche like that would be taken advantage of as fast as an invasive species. The newly "evolving" species would take over a continent in very short order since there where no predators yet, but the fossil record shows barely a handful of candidates for this myth.
The Zalchemie tracks were about 15 million years before Tiktaalik according to the ficiontal timeline too. It makes zero sense we've never found their corresponding fossils of any of their "evolutionary lineage". It's 15 million years of fossils are completely nonexistent. It's a paradox that shakes evolutionary origin myths to the core, but your mindless dogma forbids even considering this paradox's implications.
Pic related shows the insanity of this. The fossil "timeline" was obviously artificially constructed. When they found these tracks in the wrong place by 15 million years it proves they were making everything up to fit their narrative. It's not possible they could be so wrong in the construction of these lineages without faking the data in the first place. It's analogous to finding a biped ape-like footprints that are 15 MYO.
