>>14081095I do struggle with language and statistics recently.
Please help me, I don’t even know what “safe” and “effective” mean anymore. Are they just FDA-approved labels like “vaccine” is now, with no permanent definitions, just meaning whatever fits the narrative?
How do you unobjectively quantify safety if not by counting hospitalizations and death?
And how long did they prevent 100% of hospitalizations and death anyways? Longer than the vaccines were 99.8% effective initially?
I mean, the numbers change too fast to be considered labels, but they are clearly not based on any real statistics unless we can just not label the vaccine injuries and deaths as something else while we change the statistics.
It’s all so confusing now, please help me learn your mental gymnastics so that I, too, may accept the gospel of our dear leaders so faithfully.
Faith-based > reality-based
When it comes to science, right?