/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #14074135

282KiB, 1751x1350, proj76.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

You Wouldn't Patent the?Sun

Anonymous Sat 08 Jan 17:49:53 2022 No.14074135 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

Rubidium as a Converter of Gravitational Energy into Electrical Energy, Hypothesis of Gravitational Dependency for Rubidium Properties, Connections Between Hysterosis-Reducing Property of Rubidium, Light-Amplifying Property, and Previously Published Treatise on Cyclical Charge Depletion of Electrons and Proposal for Experiment to Prove or Disprove Hypothesis

Seeking to explain rubidium’s unique properties, I have extrapolated that there may be a connection between heretofore unassociated phenomena thought to be constant regardless of gravitational conditions. The currently accepted Standard Model does not adequately explain gravity and its relationship with the neutrino and the neutrino’s relationship with the electron, something I have written about at some length in other postings. Correcting this part of the Standard Model is essential to understanding the behavior of rubidium.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 08 Jan 2022 17:50:22 No.14074140 Report

Quoted By:

Rubidium, an alkali metal with one valence electron, exhibits the ability to rapidly confer spin properties from one atom’s valence electrons to the next, reducing hysterosis (the latency between the application of a force (usually electrical current through a wire) and other related effects (usually the establishment of a magnetic field. Rubidium also has the property of being able to amplify light in rubidium-doped fiber optics. What connects these two properties, I suspect, is a heretofore unacknowledged (and until I wrote about it, undiscovered) physical phenomenon: Rubidium’s valance electron’s cyclical depletion. While most electrons have a longer periodicity of replenishment, I hypothesize that the valance electron of rubidium has a substantially shorter such period. As a result of this, that electron spends a greater proportion of its time existing as a spinon only, with each replenishment period lasting ~10ms. These replenishment periods can vary depending upon the atomic structure (lattice or unstructured or two-dimensional sheet) in which the electrons are found, and the frequency of cycles also would depend upon the element the electrons are orbiting.

Of course, in keeping with my previous postings’ conclusions, during these periods of replenishment, the electrons are vulnerable to entanglement, entanglement being defined as the synchronization of motion of distant electrons as well as an unseen extra-dimensional linkage between them that allows for information to be conveyed over great distances. What is actually happening, however, is that during periods of chargelessness, information concerning spin can be duplicated by carrying a spinon away using a different electron (usually part of a beam of light) and for that spinon to be conferred upon another electron you desire to connect with the former.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 08 Jan 2022 17:51:24 No.14074146 Report

Quoted By:

A “request” for a replenishment already “sent” to the lower-dimensional plane from whence the neutrinos emerge (complete with information concerning spin) the electron is reproduced “whole” (both spinon and chargon) a fraction of a second after the “old spinon” is whisked away. Thus, you now have two electrons with identical spin states and a quantum link that cuts through a higher dimensional plane so long as the spin state of the electron is not perturbed subsequent to the establishment of the link.

What if, then, the valance electron of a rubidium atom, for whatever reason, went through one of these cycles every 0.4 seconds instead of once every 30 minutes? When dealing with large numbers of atoms, there would be a high probability that amongst at least one of these atoms going through a replenishment phase at any given moment, there would be at least one capable of shedding a spinon. During these phases, spin can be easily duplicated, as can whole electrons. This would explain how it is that rubidium is able to “produce” additional electrons in the form of light and is able to efficiently change its magnetic properties. Furthermore, I postulate that the light-amplifying effect of rubidium can only manifest in the presence of a substantial gravitational field. Bear in mind that while the electron being replenished that was “duplicated” in an entanglement experiment already has the benefit of an “incoming” wave of neutrinos to replenish it, the spinon that was whisked away has none.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 08 Jan 2022 17:52:24 No.14074150 Report

Quoted By:

The primary thing that makes this conferring of spin properties possible in entanglement experiments is that the spin property is being conferred to an electron that already has electrical charge. What would happen, then, if one whisked a spinon away and it had no electron available to confer its properties upon, and it just kept right on moving (as it would down a strand of fiber-optic cable) in the case of being paired with a photon? I propose that given enough time (not very long, by human observational standards) the spinon, in the presence of the Earth’s gravity, would experience a “spontaneous” re-charge and would, if you didn’t know what was going on, this new photon/electron would appear to be generated out of nothing. I propose that in reality, the extra electron does not come from nothing; it comes from gravitational energy. The electrons are not coming out of “nowhere,” nor are they generated thermo-electrically, piezo-electrically, or any other way. Rubidium’s properties are a manifestation of its valence electrons’ requirement for replenishment of electrical charge at a greater frequency than those of most other elements (to wit.) The most likely explanation for this unique property in this author’s mind would be the positional interrelationships between electrons of different shells within atoms as well as relative to the shells of other neighboring atoms and to what extent the crucial valence electrons may be sapped of their charge by their neighbors. This sapping could result in core electrons requiring neutrino replenishment less frequently as a result of valence electron charge-sapping (particularly in the case of rubidium) which in turn results in the need for the valence electron to be replenished with greater frequency, necessarily from the extra-dimensional neutrino source.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 08 Jan 2022 17:53:24 No.14074155 Report

Quoted By:

Rubidium is actually converting gravitational energy (neutrinos being quantized gravity) directly into electrical energy and as far as this author knows, it is the only element capable of doing this. This makes rubidium ideal for many applications including the amplification of very-weak and ultra-weak electrical signals in neural tissue, which has application for nootropic studies, precognitive studies, as well as clairvoyant and clairsentient capacity enhancement.

Each atom has some mass, so it carries with it its own micro-gravitational field. If you take rubidium atoms into space in a “zero-G” environment it will of course still have orbiting electrons as its protons still have mass. However, I propose that if we were to run tests on conductive hysterosis and light amplification in rubidium-doped electronics in a zero-gravity environment, we would find that these attributes of rubidium would be reduced measurably in the absence of a strong gravitational field. This experiment has never been run because the conventional wisdom holds that the properties of the elements are constant without regard to gravitational conditions, something very unlikely to be true.

It is my recommendation that this experiment be tried, perhaps aboard the International Space Station, to establish whether this line of thinking about physics is correct. A validation of this theorized behavior of rubidium would also provide confirmation of my other theories concerning gravity, entanglement, and axis spin of electrons.

The Future is Made In America
08Jan2022

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches