>>14067398I mean you are like arguing that snake who only sees with heat vision will see an ice cube just because it is there. That isnt how it works jackass, you cant see higher dimensions period. What is hard to understand about that?
>>14067415if you cant tell he is a moron try re-reading his posts. The question is nonsensical to beging with.
>what would something we cant see look like?It doesnt look like anything you cant fucking see it. There is no analogy or theory about how to describe to someone what something they can never see looks like. You may as well try to describe what a cloud looks like to a blind man. There is nothing in your experience or frame of reference that the object could be described to you in a way you can process and understand it anymore than a bat or dolphin could try to explain to you what it is like seeing with sonar. Even that isnt a great analogy because you can at least still be referencing a 3d shape. There is nothing that you have in your experience to understand what someone describing a 4d object to you that you would be able to draw a mental picture of it because you not only see in 3d but you also think in 3d. I may as well just make a color you cant see and say it looks like the color bleep bloop.
>What does the color bleep bloop look likeThere is nothing else you can reference they can use to understand it anymore than you can tell a blind man the difference between orange and purple
